K.B.NAGESHAPPA vs K.B.GOVINDAPPA Advocate - K.V. MALLESH — 19/2012
Case under Mines and Minerals(development and Regulation)act1957 Section UNDERORDERVIIRULE1OFC.P.C.. Status: HEARING. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KACM200003392012
Next Hearing
08th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
19/2012
Filing Date
21-04-2012
Registration No
19/2012
Registration Date
21-04-2012
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KADUR
Judge
218-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KADUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
K.B.NAGESHAPPA
Adv. K.N. RAJANNA
Respondent(s)
K.B.GOVINDAPPA Advocate - K.V. MALLESH
SMT.JAYAMMA
Adv. K.V. MALLESH
SMT.BHAGYAMMA
Adv. K.M.PRASANNA
SMT.B.N.SHARADAMMA
Adv. C.L. DEVARAJ
K.G.THIPPESHAPPA
Adv. C.L. DEVARAJ
K.G.DEVARAJU
Adv. C.L. DEVARAJ
K.G.SATHISHA
Adv. C.L. DEVARAJ
K.B.ONKARAPPA
Adv. K.V. MALLESH
K.B.KALLESHAPPA
Adv. K.M.PRASANNA
K.B.MAHESHA
Adv. K.V. MALLESH
SMT.LAKKAMMA
Adv. K.V. MALLESH
Smt. Bhagyamma
K. N. Laxmikanth
Yashodha
Murthaiah
Ramesh
Mohan kumar K. B
Veluswamy
Manjappa
Puradappa
Jyothi K. S
Bhogappa
Hearing History
Judge: 218-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KADUR
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
ISSUES
ISSUES
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | HEARING | |
| 25-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 23-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 17-03-2026 | ISSUES | |
| 11-03-2026 | ISSUES |
Interim Orders
Orders
Summary The court allowed both Interlocutory Applications (IA No. 39 and IA No. 44) filed by the transposed 2nd plaintiff. The court permitted the impleading of additional defendants (purchasers of disputed properties sold during litigation) and allowed amendment of the plaint to incorporate pleadings regarding sale transactions executed by defendants during the pendency of the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court allowed both Interlocutory Applications (IA No. 39 and IA No. 44) filed by the transposed 2nd plaintiff. The court permitted the impleading of additional defendants (purchasers of disputed properties sold during litigation) and allowed amendment of the plaint to incorporate pleadings regarding sale transactions executed by defendants during the pendency of the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts