Smt. Kiran Kumari vs Smt. Nagarathnamma — 6/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section OrderVII,Rule1CPC. Status: A.D.R.. Next hearing: 14th March 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KACM200000292024

A.D.R.

Next Hearing

14th March 2026

Filing Number

6/2024

Filing Date

09-01-2024

Registration No

6/2024

Registration Date

09-01-2024

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KADUR

Judge

218-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KADUR

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section OrderVII,Rule1CPC

Petitioner(s)

Smt. Kiran Kumari

Adv. K.A.SHANTHAPPA

Respondent(s)

Smt. Nagarathnamma

Smt. D. Jayalakshmi

D. Kodandarama Naik

Devaraja Naik

D. Ravi

D. Chandrashekha Naik

Smt. Devali Bai

Smt. Susheela P.

Hearing History

Judge: 218-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KADUR

06-03-2026

A.D.R.

12-12-2025

For compliance

04-12-2025

ORDERS

04-11-2025

ORDERS

16-09-2025

HEARING

Interim Orders

12-12-2025
Orders

Summary: The Court dismissed the plaintiff's application seeking to implead two proposed defendants (Sri G. Mohankumar and Smt. Vinodabai) as defendants No. 9 and 10 in a partition suit. The court found that the plaintiff failed to provide documentary evidence of an alleged sale agreement between the proposed defendants and Defendant No. 1, and held that the proposed defendants—who were merely engaged as agricultural cultivators—were not necessary parties to the suit. Costs of Rs. 1,000 were imposed against the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Court dismissed the plaintiff's application seeking to implead two proposed defendants (Sri G. Mohankumar and Smt. Vinodabai) as defendants No. 9 and 10 in a partition suit. The court found that the plaintiff failed to provide documentary evidence of an alleged sale agreement between the proposed defendants and Defendant No. 1, and held that the proposed defendants—who were merely engaged as agricultural cultivators—were not necessary parties to the suit. Costs of Rs. 1,000 were imposed against the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KADUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case