Smt. Kiran Kumari vs Smt. Nagarathnamma — 6/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section OrderVII,Rule1CPC. Status: A.D.R.. Next hearing: 14th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KACM200000292024
Next Hearing
14th March 2026
Filing Number
6/2024
Filing Date
09-01-2024
Registration No
6/2024
Registration Date
09-01-2024
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KADUR
Judge
218-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KADUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Smt. Kiran Kumari
Adv. K.A.SHANTHAPPA
Respondent(s)
Smt. Nagarathnamma
Smt. D. Jayalakshmi
D. Kodandarama Naik
Devaraja Naik
D. Ravi
D. Chandrashekha Naik
Smt. Devali Bai
Smt. Susheela P.
Hearing History
Judge: 218-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KADUR
A.D.R.
For compliance
ORDERS
ORDERS
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | A.D.R. |
| 12-12-2025 | For compliance |
| 04-12-2025 | ORDERS |
| 04-11-2025 | ORDERS |
| 16-09-2025 | HEARING |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Court dismissed the plaintiff's application seeking to implead two proposed defendants (Sri G. Mohankumar and Smt. Vinodabai) as defendants No. 9 and 10 in a partition suit. The court found that the plaintiff failed to provide documentary evidence of an alleged sale agreement between the proposed defendants and Defendant No. 1, and held that the proposed defendants—who were merely engaged as agricultural cultivators—were not necessary parties to the suit. Costs of Rs. 1,000 were imposed against the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Court dismissed the plaintiff's application seeking to implead two proposed defendants (Sri G. Mohankumar and Smt. Vinodabai) as defendants No. 9 and 10 in a partition suit. The court found that the plaintiff failed to provide documentary evidence of an alleged sale agreement between the proposed defendants and Defendant No. 1, and held that the proposed defendants—who were merely engaged as agricultural cultivators—were not necessary parties to the suit. Costs of Rs. 1,000 were imposed against the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts