Smt. Heera Naaz vs Smt. Bibi Ayesha — 1699/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section U/s,138. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KACM020027842025

EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

10th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1699/2025

Filing Date

04-10-2025

Registration No

1699/2025

Registration Date

04-10-2025

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, CHIKKAMAGALURU

Judge

215-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM

Acts & Sections

NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT Section U/s,138

Petitioner(s)

Smt. Heera Naaz

Adv. SUNIL KUMAR R.L.

Respondent(s)

Smt. Bibi Ayesha

Hearing History

Judge: 215-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM

28-03-2026

EVIDENCE

18-03-2026

EVIDENCE

07-03-2026

EVIDENCE

04-03-2026

EVIDENCE

21-02-2026

EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

07-03-2026
Deposition

Court Order Summary Case No.: C.C.No.1699/2025 Court: Principal District Civil Court, Chikmagalur Date of Order: 07-03-2026 Summary: The court examined PW-1 (the plaintiff/complainant) on oath in a civil case involving allegations of loan default and cheque dishonor. The witness testified regarding loans advanced to the accused totaling approximately Rs. 18,21,500, with claims that Rs. 3,21,500 remained unpaid. The court found the witness's testimony contained significant inconsistencies and contradictions regarding the loan amount, manner of disbursement, and supporting documentation. No final order on the merits was issued at this stage—the hearing appears to be part of the examination-in-chief phase. The court noted concerns about the credibility of the witness and the reliability of the evidence presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary Case No.: C.C.No.1699/2025 Court: Principal District Civil Court, Chikmagalur Date of Order: 07-03-2026 Summary: The court examined PW-1 (the plaintiff/complainant) on oath in a civil case involving allegations of loan default and cheque dishonor. The witness testified regarding loans advanced to the accused totaling approximately Rs. 18,21,500, with claims that Rs. 3,21,500 remained unpaid. The court found the witness's testimony contained significant inconsistencies and contradictions regarding the loan amount, manner of disbursement, and supporting documentation. No final order on the merits was issued at this stage—the hearing appears to be part of the examination-in-chief phase. The court noted concerns about the credibility of the witness and the reliability of the evidence presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, CHIKKAMAGALURU All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case