Smt. Heera Naaz vs Smt. Bibi Ayesha — 1699/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section U/s,138. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KACM020027842025
Next Hearing
10th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1699/2025
Filing Date
04-10-2025
Registration No
1699/2025
Registration Date
04-10-2025
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, CHIKKAMAGALURU
Judge
215-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Smt. Heera Naaz
Adv. SUNIL KUMAR R.L.
Respondent(s)
Smt. Bibi Ayesha
Hearing History
Judge: 215-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 28-03-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 18-03-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 07-03-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 04-03-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 21-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case No.: C.C.No.1699/2025 Court: Principal District Civil Court, Chikmagalur Date of Order: 07-03-2026 Summary: The court examined PW-1 (the plaintiff/complainant) on oath in a civil case involving allegations of loan default and cheque dishonor. The witness testified regarding loans advanced to the accused totaling approximately Rs. 18,21,500, with claims that Rs. 3,21,500 remained unpaid. The court found the witness's testimony contained significant inconsistencies and contradictions regarding the loan amount, manner of disbursement, and supporting documentation. No final order on the merits was issued at this stage—the hearing appears to be part of the examination-in-chief phase. The court noted concerns about the credibility of the witness and the reliability of the evidence presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case No.: C.C.No.1699/2025 Court: Principal District Civil Court, Chikmagalur Date of Order: 07-03-2026 Summary: The court examined PW-1 (the plaintiff/complainant) on oath in a civil case involving allegations of loan default and cheque dishonor. The witness testified regarding loans advanced to the accused totaling approximately Rs. 18,21,500, with claims that Rs. 3,21,500 remained unpaid. The court found the witness's testimony contained significant inconsistencies and contradictions regarding the loan amount, manner of disbursement, and supporting documentation. No final order on the merits was issued at this stage—the hearing appears to be part of the examination-in-chief phase. The court noted concerns about the credibility of the witness and the reliability of the evidence presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts