Smt.Amina Bi vs Smt.Bi.Bi. Ayesha — 1636/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section U/s,138. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 18th April 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KACM020026492025

EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

18th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1636/2025

Filing Date

19-09-2025

Registration No

1636/2025

Registration Date

19-09-2025

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, CHIKKAMAGALURU

Judge

215-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM

Acts & Sections

NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT Section U/s,138

Petitioner(s)

Smt.Amina Bi

Adv. D.S. MAMATHA.

Respondent(s)

Smt.Bi.Bi. Ayesha

Hearing History

Judge: 215-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM

28-03-2026

EVIDENCE

18-03-2026

EVIDENCE

07-03-2026

EVIDENCE

04-03-2026

EVIDENCE

21-02-2026

EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

21-02-2026
Plea
04-03-2026
313 Statement
18-03-2026
Deposition

Case Summary Case No. C.C.No.1636/2025 | Dated 18-03-2026 The witness (PW-1) testified regarding a cheque fraud case involving allegations of forged cheques and misappropriation. The court recorded the witness's statement admitting to giving false testimony about financial transactions, cheque authenticity, and the movement of funds between the parties. The witness acknowledged providing contradictory statements regarding when money was received and the circumstances of cheque delivery. The court found the witness's credibility severely compromised due to admitted false statements. Further cross-examination was indicated as necessary to complete the evidentiary proceedings in this criminal case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case No. C.C.No.1636/2025 | Dated 18-03-2026 The witness (PW-1) testified regarding a cheque fraud case involving allegations of forged cheques and misappropriation. The court recorded the witness's statement admitting to giving false testimony about financial transactions, cheque authenticity, and the movement of funds between the parties. The witness acknowledged providing contradictory statements regarding when money was received and the circumstances of cheque delivery. The court found the witness's credibility severely compromised due to admitted false statements. Further cross-examination was indicated as necessary to complete the evidentiary proceedings in this criminal case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, CHIKKAMAGALURU All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case