Smt.Amina Bi vs Smt.Bi.Bi. Ayesha — 1636/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section U/s,138. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 18th April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KACM020026492025
Next Hearing
18th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1636/2025
Filing Date
19-09-2025
Registration No
1636/2025
Registration Date
19-09-2025
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, CHIKKAMAGALURU
Judge
215-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Smt.Amina Bi
Adv. D.S. MAMATHA.
Respondent(s)
Smt.Bi.Bi. Ayesha
Hearing History
Judge: 215-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 28-03-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 18-03-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 07-03-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 04-03-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 21-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case No. C.C.No.1636/2025 | Dated 18-03-2026 The witness (PW-1) testified regarding a cheque fraud case involving allegations of forged cheques and misappropriation. The court recorded the witness's statement admitting to giving false testimony about financial transactions, cheque authenticity, and the movement of funds between the parties. The witness acknowledged providing contradictory statements regarding when money was received and the circumstances of cheque delivery. The court found the witness's credibility severely compromised due to admitted false statements. Further cross-examination was indicated as necessary to complete the evidentiary proceedings in this criminal case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No. C.C.No.1636/2025 | Dated 18-03-2026 The witness (PW-1) testified regarding a cheque fraud case involving allegations of forged cheques and misappropriation. The court recorded the witness's statement admitting to giving false testimony about financial transactions, cheque authenticity, and the movement of funds between the parties. The witness acknowledged providing contradictory statements regarding when money was received and the circumstances of cheque delivery. The court found the witness's credibility severely compromised due to admitted false statements. Further cross-examination was indicated as necessary to complete the evidentiary proceedings in this criminal case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts