The State by CEN Crime PS, Chikkamagaluru vs POORNESHA K M — 1085/2025
Case under Karnataka Excise Act 1965 Section 32,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 07th March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KACM020017842025
e-Filing Number
16-07-2025
Filing Number
1085/2025
Filing Date
19-07-2025
Registration No
1085/2025
Registration Date
19-07-2025
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, CHIKKAMAGALURU
Judge
215-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
0018
Police Station
CEN (CYBER, ECONOMIC AND NARCOTICS) CRIME PS,CHIKKAMAGALUR
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State by CEN Crime PS (Police Station), Chikkamagaluru
Adv. A.P.P
Respondent(s)
POORNESHA K M
Hearing History
Judge: 215-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
Comply
Comply
ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 04-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 25-02-2026 | Comply | |
| 23-02-2026 | Comply | |
| 20-02-2026 | ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Principal Senior Civil Judge of Chikkamagaluru acquitted Poornesha K.M. of charges under Sections 32 and 34 of the Karnataka Excise Act, finding the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Key factors in the acquittal included hostile testimony from independent witnesses (panchas) who denied witnessing any seizure, contradictory statements among police officials about the raid, a discrepancy between the plastic bag in photographs and the one presented in court, and the investigating officer's failure to investigate the liquor's source or provide explanation for the 19-day delay in sending samples for chemical examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Decision Summary The Principal Senior Civil Judge of Chikkamagaluru acquitted Poornesha K.M. of charges under Sections 32 and 34 of the Karnataka Excise Act, finding the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Key factors in the acquittal included hostile testimony from independent witnesses (panchas) who denied witnessing any seizure, contradictory statements among police officials about the raid, a discrepancy between the plastic bag in photographs and the one presented in court, and the investigating officer's failure to investigate the liquor's source or provide explanation for the 19-day delay in sending samples for chemical examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts