Yogesha S/o Marulasiddegowda, 38 years, JCB operator, R/o Kanivehalli, Lakya Hobli,CKM vs Chandrashekhar Raj Aras K.M. S/o Manjunath Raj Aras K.J. 46 years, R/o Narayanapura, Basavanahalli, — 130/2024
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/Sec.166. Status: Production of Document. Next hearing: 17th March 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KACM020006682024
Next Hearing
17th March 2026
Filing Number
131/2024
Filing Date
16-03-2024
Registration No
130/2024
Registration Date
16-03-2024
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, CHIKKAMAGALURU
Judge
215-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Yogesha S/o Marulasiddegowda, 38 years, JCB operator, R/o Kanivehalli, Lakya Hobli,CKM
Adv. V.R. POORNESAHA
Respondent(s)
Chandrashekhar Raj Aras K.M. S/o Manjunath Raj Aras K.J. 46 years, R/o Narayanapura, Basavanahalli,
The Manager, Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Co. Ltd., Chennai.
Hearing History
Judge: 215-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM
Production of Document
Production of Document
Objections
Objections
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Production of Document |
| 20-02-2026 | Production of Document |
| 06-02-2026 | Objections |
| 23-01-2026 | Objections |
| 09-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary: In MVC case number 130/2024 dated 26-12-2025, a witness was examined and sworn in. The second defendant's counsel was absent, so the party statement was dismissed. The first defendant's counsel was also absent; upon review of the order sheet, it was found that the first defendant failed to file their reply/response, so the party statement was also dismissed. The matter is adjourned for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In MVC case number 130/2024 dated 26-12-2025, a witness was examined and sworn in. The second defendant's counsel was absent, so the party statement was dismissed. The first defendant's counsel was also absent; upon review of the order sheet, it was found that the first defendant failed to file their reply/response, so the party statement was also dismissed. The matter is adjourned for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts