SHRIRAM FINANCE LIMITED vs Iliyas B.M. — 78/2026
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section U/s,138. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 22nd April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KACM020002032026
Next Hearing
22nd April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
78/2026
Filing Date
27-01-2026
Registration No
78/2026
Registration Date
27-01-2026
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, CHIKKAMAGALURU
Judge
215-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHRIRAM FINANCE LIMITED
Adv. M.G.JAGADEESH
Respondent(s)
Iliyas B.M.
Hearing History
Judge: 215-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 14-03-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 07-03-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 04-03-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 24-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
This is a criminal complaint case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act wherein M/s Shriram Finance Ltd. filed against Sri. Iliyas B.M. for issuing a dishonored cheque (No. 000027 dated 15.10.2025 for Rs. 1,05,765/-) that was returned due to insufficient funds on 16.10.2025. The court document records the accused's plea wherein questions regarding understanding of the accusation and plea (guilty or to be tried) were posed to the accused; however, the actual answers provided by the accused remain blank/incomplete in the document, making it an initial plea recording stage rather than a final order on the case merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a criminal complaint case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act wherein M/s Shriram Finance Ltd. filed against Sri. Iliyas B.M. for issuing a dishonored cheque (No. 000027 dated 15.10.2025 for Rs. 1,05,765/-) that was returned due to insufficient funds on 16.10.2025. The court document records the accused's plea wherein questions regarding understanding of the accusation and plea (guilty or to be tried) were posed to the accused; however, the actual answers provided by the accused remain blank/incomplete in the document, making it an initial plea recording stage rather than a final order on the case merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts