Sri. Muniyabovi. vs Sri. Ravikumar L.Y. — 26/2024

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KACM020001052024

EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

10th April 2026

Filing Number

26/2024

Filing Date

12-01-2024

Registration No

26/2024

Registration Date

12-01-2024

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, CHIKKAMAGALURU

Judge

215-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 166

Petitioner(s)

Sri. Muniyabovi.

Adv. J.K. RUDRE GOWDA

Respondent(s)

Sri. Ravikumar L.Y.

Sri. Raju.

The Manager, National Insurance Company Limited, Shivamogga.

Hearing History

Judge: 215-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM

06-03-2026

EVIDENCE

06-02-2026

EVIDENCE

09-01-2026

EVIDENCE

12-12-2025

EVIDENCE

07-11-2025

A.D.R.

Interim Orders

21-06-2024
Issue
21-03-2025
Deposition

The first page of this document is severely garbled and largely unreadable. However, the second page (though also containing some unclear text) appears to be a court order from an M.M.C. case (case no. 26/2024) dated 21-03-2025 from Chikmagalur court. Based on the legible portions, the court examined witness testimony on oath and addressed petitioner's arguments regarding documents and evidence presented. The order appears to dismiss or rule against the petitioner's main plea (Petition No. 1), though the specific final relief granted is difficult to discern due to text quality issues. Note: Due to significant OCR/document quality issues affecting readability, a complete and precise summary cannot be provided with full confidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The first page of this document is severely garbled and largely unreadable. However, the second page (though also containing some unclear text) appears to be a court order from an M.M.C. case (case no. 26/2024) dated 21-03-2025 from Chikmagalur court. Based on the legible portions, the court examined witness testimony on oath and addressed petitioner's arguments regarding documents and evidence presented. The order appears to dismiss or rule against the petitioner's main plea (Petition No. 1), though the specific final relief granted is difficult to discern due to text quality issues. Note: Due to significant OCR/document quality issues affecting readability, a complete and precise summary cannot be provided with full confidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, CHIKKAMAGALURU All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case