Sri. Muniyabovi. vs Sri. Ravikumar L.Y. — 26/2024
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KACM020001052024
Next Hearing
10th April 2026
Filing Number
26/2024
Filing Date
12-01-2024
Registration No
26/2024
Registration Date
12-01-2024
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, CHIKKAMAGALURU
Judge
215-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sri. Muniyabovi.
Adv. J.K. RUDRE GOWDA
Respondent(s)
Sri. Ravikumar L.Y.
Sri. Raju.
The Manager, National Insurance Company Limited, Shivamogga.
Hearing History
Judge: 215-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
A.D.R.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 06-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 09-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 12-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 07-11-2025 | A.D.R. |
Interim Orders
The first page of this document is severely garbled and largely unreadable. However, the second page (though also containing some unclear text) appears to be a court order from an M.M.C. case (case no. 26/2024) dated 21-03-2025 from Chikmagalur court. Based on the legible portions, the court examined witness testimony on oath and addressed petitioner's arguments regarding documents and evidence presented. The order appears to dismiss or rule against the petitioner's main plea (Petition No. 1), though the specific final relief granted is difficult to discern due to text quality issues. Note: Due to significant OCR/document quality issues affecting readability, a complete and precise summary cannot be provided with full confidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The first page of this document is severely garbled and largely unreadable. However, the second page (though also containing some unclear text) appears to be a court order from an M.M.C. case (case no. 26/2024) dated 21-03-2025 from Chikmagalur court. Based on the legible portions, the court examined witness testimony on oath and addressed petitioner's arguments regarding documents and evidence presented. The order appears to dismiss or rule against the petitioner's main plea (Petition No. 1), though the specific final relief granted is difficult to discern due to text quality issues. Note: Due to significant OCR/document quality issues affecting readability, a complete and precise summary cannot be provided with full confidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts