State by Women Police Station, rep. by Special Public Prosecutor, Chikkamagaluru vs Arbaz H. S/o Mohammed Hanif, 25 yrs, R/o Chammundi Coffee Curing Works Backside, Tippur Nagara, Ckm Advocate - Yashwanth Kumar S.R. — 128/2025
Case under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 Section 6. Status: JUDGEMENT. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
SPL.C(POCSO) - POCSO
CNR: KACM010023232025
Next Hearing
10th April 2026
e-Filing Number
23-10-2025
Filing Number
128/2025
Filing Date
28-10-2025
Registration No
128/2025
Registration Date
28-10-2025
Court
PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, CHIKKAMAGALURU
Judge
1459-ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE-FTSC-I
FIR Details
FIR Number
0075
Police Station
WOMEN PS,CHIKKAMAGALUR
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State by Women Police Station, rep. by Special Public Prosecutor, Chikkamagaluru
Adv. Special Public Prosecutor Chikkamagaluru
Respondent(s)
Arbaz H. S/o Mohammed Hanif, 25 yrs, R/o Chammundi Coffee Curing Works Backside, Tippur Nagara, Ckm Advocate - Yashwanth Kumar S.R.
Hearing History
Judge: 1459-ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE-FTSC-I
JUDGEMENT
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 13-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 07-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 05-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 26-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Interim Orders
The Additional District & Sessions Judge of Chikkamagaluru issued a directive noting that the 313 statement (accused's statement under CrPC Section 313) in the case has not been uploaded in the Case Information System (C.I.S.) in compliance with Supreme Court directions issued on 16.07.2013. This appears to be an administrative order addressing a procedural compliance matter rather than a substantive case outcome. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Additional District & Sessions Judge of Chikkamagaluru issued a directive noting that the 313 statement (accused's statement under CrPC Section 313) in the case has not been uploaded in the Case Information System (C.I.S.) in compliance with Supreme Court directions issued on 16.07.2013. This appears to be an administrative order addressing a procedural compliance matter rather than a substantive case outcome. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts