Sri. H.B. Chandrashekharappa. vs The Asst. Commissioner / Land Acquisition Officer, Upper Bhadra Project, Tarikere. Advocate - D.G.P. — 74/2017
Case under Land Acquisition Act Section UnderSec,64RFCandT,inLA,RandR,Act2013. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 25th April 2026.
L.A.C. - Land Acquisition Cases
CNR: KACM010019892017
Filing Number
74/2017
Filing Date
13-Sep-2017
Registration No
74/2017
Registration Date
13-Sep-2017
Court
PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, CHIKKAMAGALURU
Judge
214-I Addl District And Sessions Judge Chikmagalur
Last updated 13-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sri. H.B. Chandrashekharappa.
Adv. B.P. RAJASHEKAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Asst. Commissioner / Land Acquisition Officer, Upper Bhadra Project, Tarikere. Advocate - D.G.P.
-
2.Asst. Executive Engineer, Upper Bhadra Project, Tarikere.
Adv. K.M.JAYARAM
Case History
-
25-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Arguments
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Chikmagalur
-
24-Jan-2026
Arguments
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Chikmagalur
-
12-Dec-2025
Arguments
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Chikmagalur
-
14-Nov-2025
DepositionView PDF
Case Summary Case: LAC No. 74/2017 | Date: 14-11-2025 Outcome: The petition is dismissed. The court found that the petitioner's claims regarding land acquisition compensation under the Land Acquisition Act were not adequately substantiated with supporting documents. The court determined that the compensation of ₹19,03,435/- already provided by the land acquisition authorities was scientifically calculated in accordance with applicable law and that the petitioner failed to present credible evidence to justify a higher claim for additional compensation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Nov-2025
Arguments
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Chikmagalur
-
17-Oct-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
17-Oct-2025
Evidence
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Chikmagalur
-
12-Sep-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
12-Sep-2025
Evidence
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Chikmagalur
-
22-Aug-2025
Evidence
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Chikmagalur
-
25-Jul-2025
Evidence
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Chikmagalur
-
21-Jun-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
21-Jun-2025
Evidence
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Chikmagalur
-
02-May-2025
Evidence
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Chikmagalur
-
14-Mar-2025
Evidence
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Chikmagalur
-
22-Feb-2025
Evidence
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Chikmagalur
-
30-Jan-2025
Evidence
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Chikmagalur
-
04-Jan-2025
Evidence
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Chikmagalur
-
03-Jan-2025
Evidence
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Chikmagalur
-
07-Dec-2024
Evidence
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Chikmagalur
-
08-Nov-2024
Evidence
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Chikmagalur
-
29-Oct-2024
Evidence
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Chikmagalur
-
21-Sep-2024
Evidence
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Chikmagalur
-
24-Aug-2024
Evidence
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Chikmagalur
-
10-Jul-2024
Evidence
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Chikmagalur
-
25-Apr-2024
Evidence
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Chikmagalur
-
15-Feb-2024
Evidence
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Chikmagalur
-
06-Dec-2023
Evidence
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Chikmagalur
-
31-Oct-2023
Evidence
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Chikmagalur
-
05-Aug-2023
Evidence
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Chikmagalur
-
19-Apr-2023
Evidence
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Chikmagalur
-
25-Jan-2023
Evidence
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Chikmagalur
-
23-Nov-2022
Evidence
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Chikmagalur
-
10-Oct-2022
Evidence
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Chikmagalur
-
18-Aug-2022
Evidence
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Chikmagalur
-
24-Jun-2022
Evidence
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Chikmagalur
-
06-Apr-2022
Evidence
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Chikmagalur
-
11-Feb-2022
Evidence
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Chikmagalur
-
03-Jan-2022
Evidence
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Chikmagalur
-
08-Nov-2021
Evidence
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Chikmagalur
-
04-Sep-2021
Evidence
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Chikmagalur
-
03-Jul-2021
Evidence
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Chikmagalur
-
04-Jun-2021
Evidence
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Chikmagalur
-
18-Mar-2021
Evidence
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Chikmagalur
-
22-Jan-2021
Evidence
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Chikmagalur
-
25-Nov-2020
Evidence
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Chikmagalur
-
01-Oct-2020
Evidence
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Chikmagalur
-
29-Jul-2020
Evidence
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Chikmagalur
-
15-Jun-2020
Evidence
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Chikmagalur
-
09-Mar-2020
Evidence
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Chikmagalur
-
02-Jan-2020
Evidence
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Chikmagalur
-
09-Oct-2019
Evidence
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Chikmagalur
-
22-Jul-2019
Evidence
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Chikmagalur
-
10-Jun-2019
Evidence
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Chikmagalur
-
02-Apr-2019
Evidence
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Chikmagalur
-
11-Jan-2019
Evidence
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Chikmagalur
-
27-Oct-2018
Evidence
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Chikmagalur
-
19-Jul-2018
Evidence
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Chikmagalur
-
26-Apr-2018
Evidence
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Chikmagalur
-
28-Mar-2018
Evidence
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Chikmagalur
-
08-Feb-2018
For Objection
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Chikmagalur
-
02-Dec-2017
For Objection
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Chikmagalur
-
14-Sep-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Sep-2017
Case filed
Registration No. 74/2017
Case Summary Case: LAC No. 74/2017 | Date: 14-11-2025 Outcome: The petition is dismissed. The court found that the petitioner's claims regarding land acquisition compensation under the Land Acquisition Act were not adequately substantiated with supporting documents. The court determined that the compensation of ₹19,03,435/- already provided by the land acquisition authorities was scientifically calculated in accordance with applicable law and that the petitioner failed to present credible evidence to justify a higher claim for additional compensation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts