HDB Financial Services Ltd., Hassan Branch Rep., by its Authorized Signatory Mr.Varun P. vs Sri. Nageshagowda K. (Borrower) — 144/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U.O.21 rule,11(2), R/w Sec.,3(i) Comm.,Court Act. Disposed: Uncontested--CLOSED on 16th March 2026.
EX (Execution Petition ) - Execution Petition Under Order
CNR: KACM010016542025
Filing Number
144/2025
Filing Date
12-08-2025
Registration No
144/2025
Registration Date
12-08-2025
Court
PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, CHIKKAMAGALURU
Judge
994-II ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CLOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
HDB Financial Services Ltd., Hassan Branch Rep., by its Authorized Signatory Mr.Varun P.
Adv. YOGESHA
Respondent(s)
Sri. Nageshagowda K. (Borrower)
Sri. Darshan H.N. ( Co-Borrower)
Hearing History
Judge: 994-II ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE
Disposed
For attachment/ arrest/ garnishee proceedings
For attachment/ arrest/ garnishee proceedings
For attachment/ arrest/ garnishee proceedings
For attachment/ arrest/ garnishee proceedings
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-03-2026 | For attachment/ arrest/ garnishee proceedings |
| 12-02-2026 | For attachment/ arrest/ garnishee proceedings |
| 24-01-2026 | For attachment/ arrest/ garnishee proceedings |
| 19-12-2025 | For attachment/ arrest/ garnishee proceedings |
Final Orders / Judgements
The II Additional District and Sessions Judge at Chikkamagaluru dismissed the execution petition filed by HDB Financial Services Ltd. against borrowers Sri. Nageshagowda K. and Sri. Darshan H.N. because the decree holder failed to pay the required process fee within the stipulated 7-day period. The petition was consequently closed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The II Additional District and Sessions Judge at Chikkamagaluru dismissed the execution petition filed by HDB Financial Services Ltd. against borrowers Sri. Nageshagowda K. and Sri. Darshan H.N. because the decree holder failed to pay the required process fee within the stipulated 7-day period. The petition was consequently closed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts