State by Banakal Police Station, rep. by Special Public Prosecutor vs Ranjan Gowda S/o Shivalingegowda, 25 years, R/o Somanahalli Village, Dudda Hobli, Hassan Taluk — 61/2025

Case under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 Section 4. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.

SPL.C(POCSO) - POCSO

CNR: KACM010010332025

ARGUMENTS

Next Hearing

10th April 2026

e-Filing Number

30-05-2025

Filing Number

61/2025

Filing Date

04-06-2025

Registration No

61/2025

Registration Date

04-06-2025

Court

PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, CHIKKAMAGALURU

Judge

1459-ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE-FTSC-I

FIR Details

FIR Number

0028

Police Station

BANAKAL PS

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

POCSO Act Section 4
INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 376(1),506

Petitioner(s)

State by Banakal Police Station, rep. by Special Public Prosecutor

Adv. Special Public Prosecutor Chikkamagaluru

Respondent(s)

Ranjan Gowda S/o Shivalingegowda, 25 years, R/o Somanahalli Village, Dudda Hobli, Hassan Taluk

Hearing History

Judge: 1459-ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE-FTSC-I

26-03-2026

ARGUMENTS

07-03-2026

ARGUMENTS

28-02-2026

ARGUMENTS

21-02-2026

ARGUMENTS

16-02-2026

ARGUMENTS

Interim Orders

22-07-2025
Charge
16-02-2026
313 Statement

The Additional District & Sessions Judge of Chikkamagaluru issued a note stating that the 313 statement (accused's statement under CrPC Section 313) in the case has not been uploaded in the C.I.S. (Court Information System) in compliance with Supreme Court directions dated 16.07.2013. This appears to be an administrative directive rather than a substantive court order on the case merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional District & Sessions Judge of Chikkamagaluru issued a note stating that the 313 statement (accused's statement under CrPC Section 313) in the case has not been uploaded in the C.I.S. (Court Information System) in compliance with Supreme Court directions dated 16.07.2013. This appears to be an administrative directive rather than a substantive court order on the case merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, CHIKKAMAGALURU All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case