State by Banakal Police Station, rep. by Special Public Prosecutor vs Ranjan Gowda S/o Shivalingegowda, 25 years, R/o Somanahalli Village, Dudda Hobli, Hassan Taluk — 61/2025

Case under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 Section 4. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 10-Apr-2026 this date has passed

SPL.C(POCSO) - POCSO

CNR: KACM010010332025

e-Filing Number

30-05-2025

Filing Number

61/2025

Filing Date

04-Jun-2025

Registration No

61/2025

Registration Date

04-Jun-2025

Court

PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, CHIKKAMAGALURU

Judge

1459-Addl. District And Sessions Judge-Ftsc-I

Last updated 07-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

0028

Police Station

BANAKAL PS

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 Section 4
Indian Penal Code Section 376(1),506

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State by Banakal Police Station, rep. by Special Public Prosecutor

    Adv. Special Public Prosecutor Chikkamagaluru

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ranjan Gowda S/o Shivalingegowda, 25 years, R/o Somanahalli Village, Dudda Hobli, Hassan Taluk

Case History

  1. 10-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 26-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge-Ftsc-I

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge-Ftsc-I

  4. 28-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge-Ftsc-I

  5. 21-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge-Ftsc-I

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    313 StatementView PDF

    The Additional District & Sessions Judge of Chikkamagaluru issued a note stating that the 313 statement (accused's statement under CrPC Section 313) in the case has not been uploaded in the C.I.S. (Court Information System) in compliance with Supreme Court directions dated 16.07.2013. This appears to be an administrative directive rather than a substantive court order on the case merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 16-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge-Ftsc-I

  8. 07-Feb-2026

    Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge-Ftsc-I

  9. 27-Jan-2026

    Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge-Ftsc-I

  10. 19-Jan-2026

    Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge-Ftsc-I

  11. 29-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge-Ftsc-I

  12. 06-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge-Ftsc-I

  13. 22-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge-Ftsc-I

  14. 15-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge-Ftsc-I

  15. 25-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge-Ftsc-I

  16. 26-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge-Ftsc-I

  17. 10-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge-Ftsc-I

  18. 22-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge-Ftsc-I

  19. 05-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge-Ftsc-I

  20. 22-Jul-2025

    ChargeView PDF

  21. 22-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge-Ftsc-I

  22. 08-Jul-2025

    Hear Before Charge

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge-Ftsc-I

  23. 07-Jul-2025

    Hear Before Charge

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge-Ftsc-I

  24. 30-Jun-2025

    Orders

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge-Ftsc-I

  25. 26-Jun-2025

    For Objection

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge-Ftsc-I

  26. 25-Jun-2025

    Notice

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge-Ftsc-I

  27. 24-Jun-2025

    Hear Before Charge

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge-Ftsc-I

  28. 11-Jun-2025

    Hear Before Charge

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge-Ftsc-I

  29. 04-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 04-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 61/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional District & Sessions Judge of Chikkamagaluru issued a note stating that the 313 statement (accused's statement under CrPC Section 313) in the case has not been uploaded in the C.I.S. (Court Information System) in compliance with Supreme Court directions dated 16.07.2013. This appears to be an administrative directive rather than a substantive court order on the case merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case