State by R.F.O. Tarikere, rep by Public Prosecutor, Chikkamgaluru vs Chandrashekar V./Boti Chandru S/o Veeranna, 52 yrs, R/o Bovi colony, 4th cross, Kodicamp, Tarike Advocate - B.T. DUSHAYANTH — 36/2017
Case under Karnataka Forest Act 1963 Section 86,. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 22nd April 2026.
S.C (SESSION CASES) - SESSION CASES
CNR: KACM010006622017
Next Hearing
22nd April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
36/2017
Filing Date
22-03-2017
Registration No
36/2017
Registration Date
22-03-2017
Court
PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, CHIKKAMAGALURU
Judge
994-II ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE
FIR Details
FIR Number
22
Police Station
RANGE FOREST OFFICER, TARIKERE
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State by R.F.O. Tarikere, rep by Public Prosecutor, Chikkamgaluru
Adv. Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Chandrashekar V./Boti Chandru S/o Veeranna, 52 yrs, R/o Bovi colony, 4th cross, Kodicamp, Tarike Advocate - B.T. DUSHAYANTH
Manju S/o Ramegowda, 39 yrs, R/o Halegangoor, Lingadahalli H, Tarikere Taluk, Chikkamagaluru
Adv. K.S.SHANTHIPRAKASH
Murugesha S/o Kuppa, 20 yrs, R/o Halegangoor, Lingadahalli H, Tarikere Taluk, Chikkamagaluru
Adv. G.V.K.
Devi W/o Chandrshekara, 42 yrs, R/o Bovi colony, 4th cross, Kodicamp, Tarikere, Chikkamagaluru
Adv. B.T. DUSHAYANTH
Hearing History
Judge: 994-II ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 04-04-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 07-03-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 12-02-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 23-01-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 04-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary SKIP The document text is predominantly garbled and unreadable, with significant character encoding errors throughout the Kannada text. While some fragments are decipherable, the document does not contain a clear, coherent court order with a discernible outcome (such as bail granted/denied, petition allowed/dismissed, or case adjournment). The corruption of the text makes it impossible to provide an accurate summary of the judicial order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary SKIP The document text is predominantly garbled and unreadable, with significant character encoding errors throughout the Kannada text. While some fragments are decipherable, the document does not contain a clear, coherent court order with a discernible outcome (such as bail granted/denied, petition allowed/dismissed, or case adjournment). The corruption of the text makes it impossible to provide an accurate summary of the judicial order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts