M.R.Ranjith Kumar S/o Rame Gowda M.S.,57 yrs, Adhimane, Mugthihalli post, CKM Taluk vs State by Rural Police, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, Chikkamagaluru. — 169/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U.Sec.,482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KACM010006272026

e-Filing Number

11-03-2026

Filing Number

168/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

169/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, CHIKKAMAGALURU

Judge

213-Prl. District And Sessions Judge. Chikkamagaluru

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

0098

Police Station

CHICKMAGALUR RURAL PS

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U.Sec.,482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section U.Sec., 115(2), 351(2), 109(1), 118(1), 3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M.R.Ranjith Kumar S/o Rame Gowda M.S.,57 yrs, Adhimane, Mugthihalli post, CKM Taluk

    Adv. D.C.Putte Gowda

  2. 2.M.S. Vikranth, S/o M.B.Srikante Gowda, 38 years, Mugthihalli village and post, CKM Taluk.

  3. 3.M.R.Yogish, S/o Ramappa Shetty, 55 yrs, Behind Pias compound road, Undedasarahalli, CKM..

  4. 4.Mohan.H.K S/o. late. Kalachar, 55 years, Hiremagalur village and post, CKM.

  5. 5.Harshith/Harshith Raj Urs, S/o Sugandaraj urs, 28 yrs, R/at. Near Veeranjaneya Temple Road, Tegur, Rampura Post, CKM Taluk.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State by Rural Police, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, Chikkamagaluru.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Case Summary: 169/2026 Decision: The court GRANTED anticipatory bail to all five petitioners in Crime No. 98/2026, finding insufficient prima facie evidence and noting the dispute is primarily civil in nature. Each petitioner must execute a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 with two sureties and comply with conditions including appearing before the investigating officer, cooperating fully, and not threatening witnesses. Key Reasoning: The court found that allegations were vague and omnibus in nature against approximately 100 persons without specific individual acts, no medical evidence of injuries was presented, and the underlying dispute over land and a vehicle was fundamentally civil. The offenses (under BNS sections 115, 351, 109, 118) are not capital or life-imprisonment offenses, and petitioners are permanent local residents with low flight risk. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge. Chikkamagaluru

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge. Chikkamagaluru

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    For Objection

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge. Chikkamagaluru

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 169/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 169/2026 Decision: The court GRANTED anticipatory bail to all five petitioners in Crime No. 98/2026, finding insufficient prima facie evidence and noting the dispute is primarily civil in nature. Each petitioner must execute a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 with two sureties and comply with conditions including appearing before the investigating officer, cooperating fully, and not threatening witnesses. Key Reasoning: The court found that allegations were vague and omnibus in nature against approximately 100 persons without specific individual acts, no medical evidence of injuries was presented, and the underlying dispute over land and a vehicle was fundamentally civil. The offenses (under BNS sections 115, 351, 109, 118) are not capital or life-imprisonment offenses, and petitioners are permanent local residents with low flight risk. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case