Afshad S/o Zulfikar Anjum,19 yrs, Iyappanagara, Channel Area, CKM. vs State by Basavanahalli Police, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, Chikkamagaluru. — 156/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U.Sec.,482,. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KACM010005872026
e-Filing Number
05-03-2026
Filing Number
155/2026
Filing Date
06-03-2026
Registration No
156/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, CHIKKAMAGALURU
Judge
214-I ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE CHIKMAGALUR
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
0014
Police Station
BASAVANAHALLI PS
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Afshad S/o Zulfikar Anjum,19 yrs, Iyappanagara, Channel Area, CKM.
Adv. DEEKSHITH E J
Respondent(s)
State by Basavanahalli Police, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, Chikkamagaluru.
Smt.Sudha, Women supervisor, CDPO office, CKM..
Hearing History
Judge: 214-I ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE CHIKMAGALUR
Disposed
ORDERS
ARGUMENTS
For Objection
For Objection
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 18-03-2026 | ORDERS | |
| 16-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 13-03-2026 | For Objection | |
| 11-03-2026 | For Objection |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner (Afshad, age 19) accused in a case involving SC/ST Prevention of Atrocities charges, finding that no prima facie case was established against him. The judge reasoned that inconsistencies in the complainant's version (claiming six suspects were handed to police but only two were later produced) and the absence of custodial interrogation needs weakened the prosecution's case, allowing the court to override the statutory bar on bail under Section 18A of the SC/ST Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner (Afshad, age 19) accused in a case involving SC/ST Prevention of Atrocities charges, finding that no prima facie case was established against him. The judge reasoned that inconsistencies in the complainant's version (claiming six suspects were handed to police but only two were later produced) and the absence of custodial interrogation needs weakened the prosecution's case, allowing the court to override the statutory bar on bail under Section 18A of the SC/ST Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts