Rahil Shariff S/o Aslam Shariff, 30 yrs, R/o Pampa Nagara. CKM City. vs State by Women Police, CKM Represented by the Public Prosecutor, CKM. — 148/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U.Sec.,482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KACM010005392026

e-Filing Number

03-03-2026

Filing Number

147/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

148/2026

Registration Date

03-Mar-2026

Court

PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, CHIKKAMAGALURU

Judge

214-I Addl District And Sessions Judge Chikmagalur

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 07-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

0023

Police Station

WOMEN PS,CHIKKAMAGALUR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U.Sec.,482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section U.Sec.,109, 329(4), 118(1), 324(2), 351(2), R/w 3(5), 352, 74
Sc and St (Prevention of Attrocities)act,1989 Section U.Sec., 3(1)(r)(s)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rahil Shariff S/o Aslam Shariff, 30 yrs, R/o Pampa Nagara. CKM City.

    Adv. H.M. SUDHAKAR

  2. 2.Tahsin Raahi, W/o Rahil Shriff, 28 yrs, R/o Pampa Nagara, CKM City.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State by Women Police, CKM Represented by the Public Prosecutor, CKM.

  2. 2.Chethana. N. S., W/o Jithendra Rathod, 40 yrs, R/at Basava Dhanya. HIG colony, Housing Board, Jyothinagara Post, CKM City.

  3. 3.Jithendra Rathod, 42 years, R/at Basava Dhanya. HIG colony, Housing Board, Jyothinagara Post, CKM City.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Summary The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner (accused No.2) in a case involving charges under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and other offences related to an alleged weapon attack and threats. The court found that no prima facie case could be made out against the petitioner since the allegations were primarily against accused No.1, and the petitioner's alleged involvement (threatening via WhatsApp) lacked sufficient evidentiary basis. Bail was granted on condition of executing a personal bond of Rs. 1 lakh with two sureties and compliance with standard bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    I Addl District And Sessions Judge Chikmagalur

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Orders

    I Addl District And Sessions Judge Chikmagalur

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    For Objection

    I Addl District And Sessions Judge Chikmagalur

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    For Objection

    I Addl District And Sessions Judge Chikmagalur

  7. 07-Mar-2026

    For Objection

    I Addl District And Sessions Judge Chikmagalur

  8. 04-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 148/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner (accused No.2) in a case involving charges under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and other offences related to an alleged weapon attack and threats. The court found that no prima facie case could be made out against the petitioner since the allegations were primarily against accused No.1, and the petitioner's alleged involvement (threatening via WhatsApp) lacked sufficient evidentiary basis. Bail was granted on condition of executing a personal bond of Rs. 1 lakh with two sureties and compliance with standard bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case