State by Ajjampura Police Station, Rept. by The Public Prosecutor, Chikmagalur. vs Madhu S/o Manjappa, ___ yrs, Coolie, R/o Bankanakatte, Shivani Hobli, Ajjampura Taluk. Advocate - I.S. THEJASVI — 23/2019

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,326,504,506. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

SPL.C - SPECIAL CASES

CNR: KACM010005352019

EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

17th June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

23/2019

Filing Date

13-03-2019

Registration No

23/2019

Registration Date

13-03-2019

Court

PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, CHIKKAMAGALURU

Judge

214-I ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE CHIKMAGALUR

FIR Details

FIR Number

315

Police Station

AJJAMPURA PS

Year

2018

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 323,326,504,506
SC and ST (Prevention of Attrocities)Act,1989 Section 3(1)(r),3(1)(s).

Petitioner(s)

State by Ajjampura Police Station, Rept. by The Public Prosecutor, Chikmagalur.

Adv. The Public Prosecutor, Chikmagalur.

Respondent(s)

Madhu S/o Manjappa, ___ yrs, Coolie, R/o Bankanakatte, Shivani Hobli, Ajjampura Taluk. Advocate - I.S. THEJASVI

Hearing History

Judge: 214-I ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE CHIKMAGALUR

06-04-2026

EVIDENCE

07-03-2026

EVIDENCE

24-12-2025

EVIDENCE

18-10-2025

EVIDENCE

02-09-2025

EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

11-02-2021
Charge
07-07-2025
Deposition
07-07-2025
Deposition

Court Order Summary Case: Spl.C. 23-2019, Special Court, Chikmagalur (Karnataka) Outcome: The witness examination was completed on 07-07-2025. The court found no further cross-examination necessary and closed the witness statement. The testimony regarding the recovery of documents (NI.P.4 and NI.P.5 photograph) and identification of signatures was recorded and marked as exhibits by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary Case: Spl.C. 23-2019, Special Court, Chikmagalur (Karnataka) Outcome: The witness examination was completed on 07-07-2025. The court found no further cross-examination necessary and closed the witness statement. The testimony regarding the recovery of documents (NI.P.4 and NI.P.5 photograph) and identification of signatures was recorded and marked as exhibits by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, CHIKKAMAGALURU All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case