Prakash. M.S., S/o Late Sheshappa. 65 yrs, Sathihalli village, Gullenpete Post, CKM Tq. vs State by Aldur Police, Represented by the Public Prosecutor, CKM.. — 130/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U.Sec., 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KACM010004762026
e-Filing Number
25-02-2026
Filing Number
129/2026
Filing Date
25-02-2026
Registration No
130/2026
Registration Date
25-02-2026
Court
PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, CHIKKAMAGALURU
Judge
214-I ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE CHIKMAGALUR
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Prakash. M.S., S/o Late Sheshappa. 65 yrs, Sathihalli village, Gullenpete Post, CKM Tq.
Adv. H.M. SUDHAKAR
Jayakumar.M.V. S/o Late Venkataramana, 60 yrs, Sathihalli village, Gullenpete Post, CKM Tq.
Adv. AKSHAY RAJASHEKAR KAMMRDI
K.Putte Gowda, S/o Deve Gowda, 65 yrs, Karemane Village, Gullenpete Post, CKM Tq.
Adv. AKSHAY RAJASHEKAR KAMMRDI
Kumare Gowda. S/o Late Kenche Gowda, 61 yrs, Sathihalli village, Gullenpete Post, CKM Tq.
Bhujanga Shetty S/o Late. Angarasapalya, 67 yrs, Padavu meginmane Kulashekar Post, Mangaluru.
Respondent(s)
State by Aldur Police, Represented by the Public Prosecutor, CKM..
Poornesh, S/o Kalaiah, 38 yrs, Ambedkar Nagara, Sathihalli village, Gullenpete Post, CKM Tq.
Hearing History
Judge: 214-I ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE CHIKMAGALUR
Disposed
ORDERS
For Objection
For Objection
For Objection
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-03-2026 | ORDERS |
| 06-03-2026 | For Objection |
| 05-03-2026 | For Objection |
| 03-03-2026 | For Objection |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court granted anticipatory bail to five accused persons charged under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and other serious offenses. The judge found that no prima facie case was established against the petitioners, as the allegations appeared to stem from an underlying civil dispute over land ownership rather than genuine atrocities. The court noted the inordinate delay (4+ months) in filing the complaint and determined that the statutory bar on bail under Section 18/18A of the SC/ST Act did not apply where no prima facie case exists, citing Supreme Court precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court granted anticipatory bail to five accused persons charged under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and other serious offenses. The judge found that no prima facie case was established against the petitioners, as the allegations appeared to stem from an underlying civil dispute over land ownership rather than genuine atrocities. The court noted the inordinate delay (4+ months) in filing the complaint and determined that the statutory bar on bail under Section 18/18A of the SC/ST Act did not apply where no prima facie case exists, citing Supreme Court precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts