The State by Rural Police Station, Rep. Special Public Prosecutor, CKM vs Vinay D, S/o Dinesh, 21 yrs, R/o Eshwarahalli Village, Lakya Hobli, CKM Advocate - Harshendra Kumara G P — 28/2026

Case under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 Section 6. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 02nd April 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 02-Apr-2026 this date has passed

SPL.C(POCSO) - POCSO

CNR: KACM010004502026

e-Filing Number

12-02-2026

Filing Number

28/2026

Filing Date

21-Feb-2026

Registration No

28/2026

Registration Date

21-Feb-2026

Court

PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, CHIKKAMAGALURU

Judge

1459-Addl. District And Sessions Judge-Ftsc-I

Last updated 13-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 Section 6
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 332(b),64(2)(m)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State by Rural Police Station, Rep. Special Public Prosecutor, CKM

    Adv. Special Public Prosecutor Chikkamagaluru

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vinay D, S/o Dinesh, 21 yrs, R/o Eshwarahalli Village, Lakya Hobli, CKM Advocate - Harshendra Kumara G P

Case History

  1. 02-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    ChargeView PDF

    The Additional District & Sessions Judge of Chikkamagaluru issued a note stating that following Supreme Court Committee directions (Ref. No. EC/54/2013 dated 16.07.2013), the Charge in the case has not been uploaded in the C.I.S. (Case Information System). This appears to be an administrative note rather than a substantive court order on the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge-Ftsc-I

  4. 21-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 21-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 28/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional District & Sessions Judge of Chikkamagaluru issued a note stating that following Supreme Court Committee directions (Ref. No. EC/54/2013 dated 16.07.2013), the Charge in the case has not been uploaded in the C.I.S. (Case Information System). This appears to be an administrative note rather than a substantive court order on the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case