Mohammed Shabaz S/o Late Mohammed Mumtaz, 31 yrs, Prop. Sagar Technical Engineering, vs Ganesh Enter Prises, Rep. by Smt. C.P. Veena, 42 yrs, W/o A.L.Kumar, R/o Sangham Complex, — 26/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U.Sec., 415. Disposed: Uncontested--Settele in Lok Adalath on 14th March 2026.

CRL.A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: KACM010002992026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

26/2026

Filing Date

05-02-2026

Registration No

26/2026

Registration Date

05-02-2026

Court

PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, CHIKKAMAGALURU

Judge

994-II ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Settele in Lok Adalath

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U.Sec., 415
NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT Section U.Sec.,138,

Petitioner(s)

Mohammed Shabaz S/o Late Mohammed Mumtaz, 31 yrs, Prop. Sagar Technical Engineering,

Adv. H.E. AZAD KHAN

Respondent(s)

Ganesh Enter Prises, Rep. by Smt. C.P. Veena, 42 yrs, W/o A.L.Kumar, R/o Sangham Complex,

Hearing History

Judge: 994-II ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE

14-03-2026

Disposed

07-03-2026

A.D.R.

07-02-2026

NOTICE

06-02-2026

ORDERS

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
Orders

Summary The II Additional District and Sessions Judge at Chikkamagaluru accepted an amicable settlement between Mohammed Shabaz (appellant) and Ganesh Enter Prises (respondent) in a criminal appeal involving cheque bounce charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court compounded the offense, set aside the trial court's judgment, acquitted the appellant, and released him from bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The II Additional District and Sessions Judge at Chikkamagaluru accepted an amicable settlement between Mohammed Shabaz (appellant) and Ganesh Enter Prises (respondent) in a criminal appeal involving cheque bounce charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court compounded the offense, set aside the trial court's judgment, acquitted the appellant, and released him from bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, CHIKKAMAGALURU All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case