Mohammed Shabaz S/o Late Mohammed Mumtaz, 31 yrs, Prop. Sagar Technical Engineering, vs Ganesh Enter Prises, Rep. by Smt. C.P. Veena, 42 yrs, W/o A.L.Kumar, R/o Sangham Complex, — 26/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U.Sec., 415. Disposed: Uncontested--Settele in Lok Adalath on 14th March 2026.
CRL.A - CRIMINAL APPEAL
CNR: KACM010002992026
Filing Number
26/2026
Filing Date
05-Feb-2026
Registration No
26/2026
Registration Date
05-Feb-2026
Court
PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, CHIKKAMAGALURU
Judge
994-II Addl District And Sessions Judge
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Settele in Lok Adalath
Last updated 07-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Mohammed Shabaz S/o Late Mohammed Mumtaz, 31 yrs, Prop. Sagar Technical Engineering,
Adv. H.E. AZAD KHAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ganesh Enter Prises, Rep. by Smt. C.P. Veena, 42 yrs, W/o A.L.Kumar, R/o Sangham Complex,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Orders
Summary The II Additional District and Sessions Judge at Chikkamagaluru accepted an amicable settlement between Mohammed Shabaz (appellant) and Ganesh Enter Prises (respondent) in a criminal appeal involving cheque bounce charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court compounded the offense, set aside the trial court's judgment, acquitted the appellant, and released him from bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
II Addl District And Sessions Judge
-
07-Mar-2026
A.D.R.
II Addl District And Sessions Judge
-
07-Feb-2026
Notice
II Addl District And Sessions Judge
-
06-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 26/2026
Summary The II Additional District and Sessions Judge at Chikkamagaluru accepted an amicable settlement between Mohammed Shabaz (appellant) and Ganesh Enter Prises (respondent) in a criminal appeal involving cheque bounce charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court compounded the offense, set aside the trial court's judgment, acquitted the appellant, and released him from bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts