KAMALAMMA vs RATHNAMMA Advocate - B.C. SIDDESH — 333/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U,O,7,RULE,1,OF,CPC. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 14th July 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KACD510017612020
Filing Number
333/2020
Filing Date
10-Dec-2020
Registration No
333/2020
Registration Date
10-Dec-2020
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HOSDURGA
Judge
240-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KAMALAMMA
Adv. C. BASAVARAJAPPA
Respondent(s)
-
1.RATHNAMMA Advocate - B.C. SIDDESH
-
2.MANJAPPA
-
3.RAJAPPA
-
4.PREM KUMAR
-
5.PRAKASH
Case History
-
14-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
15-Jun-2026
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
23-Apr-2026
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
18-Mar-2026
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Feb-2026
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
13-Jan-2026
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
26-Nov-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
10-Nov-2025
DepositionView PDF
Case 333/2020 Summary Case: Original Civil Suit 333/2020, Principal Civil Court & JMMFC, Hosadurga Date: 10.11.2025 Petitioner: Kamalamma Respondents: Rathnamma (Advocate B.C. Siddesh), Manjappa, Rajappa Outcome: The court examined witness PW-1 and completed cross-examination by respondents' counsel. The petitioner presented arguments challenging the respondents' claims regarding property boundaries, marriage documentation, alleged photographs, and mobile phone evidence. The petitioner's advocate was granted adjournment to continue arguments. The case was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Nov-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
22-Sep-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
19-Aug-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Jul-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
16-Jul-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
04-Jun-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
17-Mar-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
05-Mar-2025
Orders
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
15-Jan-2025
Objection To I.A.
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
26-Nov-2024
Plaintiff Side Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Oct-2024
Plaintiff Side Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
20-Aug-2024
Plaintiff Side Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
04-Jul-2024
Plaintiff Side Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
08-Apr-2024
Plaintiff Side Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
20-Jan-2024
Plaintiff Side Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
02-Nov-2023
Plaintiff Side Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
08-Sep-2023
Plaintiff Side Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
22-Jun-2023
Plaintiff Side Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Mar-2023
Plaintiff Side Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Dec-2022
Plaintiff Side Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
22-Sep-2022
Plaintiff Side Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
25-May-2022
Plaintiff Side Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
11-Feb-2022
Plaintiff Side Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
11-Jan-2022
Plaintiff Side Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
10-Jan-2022
Plaintiff Side Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
03-Dec-2021
U/S 89 CPC
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
10-Nov-2021
Plaintiff Side Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
24-Aug-2021
Plaintiff Side Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
28-May-2021
Plaintiff Side Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
05-Mar-2021
Plaintiff Side Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
17-Feb-2021
Written Statement
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
15-Feb-2021
Written Statement
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
22-Jan-2021
Written Statement
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
10-Dec-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Dec-2020
Case filed
Registration No. 333/2020
Case 333/2020 Summary Case: Original Civil Suit 333/2020, Principal Civil Court & JMMFC, Hosadurga Date: 10.11.2025 Petitioner: Kamalamma Respondents: Rathnamma (Advocate B.C. Siddesh), Manjappa, Rajappa Outcome: The court examined witness PW-1 and completed cross-examination by respondents' counsel. The petitioner presented arguments challenging the respondents' claims regarding property boundaries, marriage documentation, alleged photographs, and mobile phone evidence. The petitioner's advocate was granted adjournment to continue arguments. The case was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts