S THIMMAPPA vs THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER — 104/2013

Case under U/o 7 Rule 1 Cpc. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 23-Jun-2026

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KACD510006692013

Filing Number

104/2013

Filing Date

08-Apr-2013

Registration No

104/2013

Registration Date

08-Apr-2013

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HOSDURGA

Judge

241-Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

U/o 7 Rule 1 Cpc

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.S THIMMAPPA

    Adv. C G RAGHAVENDRA, M Mohan Kumar

  2. 2.S LOKESH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

  2. 2.THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

  3. 3.THE TAHSILDAR

  4. 4.GOVINDAPPA

  5. 5.SRI SRI PURUSHOTTAMANANDA PURI MAHA SWAMYGALU

Case History

  1. 23-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  3. 03-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  5. 24-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  6. 15-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  7. 08-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  8. 28-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case Summary: OS No. 104/2013 Outcome: Application dismissed; case to proceed to plaintiff's evidence The court rejected the plaintiffs' application to withdraw the suit with liberty to file a fresh one, finding they failed to establish any formal defect or sufficient grounds required under Order XXIII Rule 1(3) CPC. The alleged inconsistencies between pleadings, documents, and reliefs pertain to case merits rather than procedural defects. Despite High Court directions to specify technical reasons, the plaintiffs merely reiterated plaint averments without concrete particulars, necessitating the suit proceed to evidence phase. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  9. 28-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  10. 27-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  11. 23-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  12. 18-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  13. 16-Mar-2026

    Hearing On I.A.

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  14. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing On I.A.

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  15. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing On I.A.

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  16. 03-Mar-2026

    Hearing On I.A.

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  17. 28-Feb-2026

    Notice

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  18. 28-Feb-2026

    Restored

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  19. 28-Feb-2026

    Hearing On I.A.

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  20. 15-Apr-2021

    OrdersView PDF

  21. 15-Apr-2021

    Disposed

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  22. 03-Apr-2021

    Orders

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  23. 26-Mar-2021

    Hearing On I.A.

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  24. 24-Mar-2021

    Hearing On I.A.

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  25. 15-Mar-2021

    Hearing On I.A.

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  26. 22-Feb-2021

    Restored

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  27. 22-Feb-2021

    Notice

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  28. 22-Feb-2021

    Notice

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  29. 18-Mar-2015

    OrdersView PDF

  30. 18-Mar-2015

    Disposed

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  31. 18-Mar-2015

    Disposed

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  32. 09-Mar-2015

    Orders

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  33. 28-Feb-2015

    Hearing

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  34. 26-Feb-2015

    Objection

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  35. 12-Feb-2015

    Objection

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  36. 02-Feb-2015

    Plaintiff Side Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  37. 19-Jan-2015

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  38. 17-Dec-2014

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  39. 27-Oct-2014

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  40. 26-Aug-2014

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  41. 05-Aug-2014

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  42. 23-Jul-2014

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  43. 08-Jul-2014

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  44. 18-Jun-2014

    Written Statement

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  45. 12-Jun-2014

    Written Statement

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  46. 04-Jun-2014

    Written Statement

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  47. 16-Apr-2014

    Notice To Respondent

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  48. 07-Apr-2014

    Steps

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  49. 17-Feb-2014

    Plaintiff Side Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  50. 21-Jan-2014

    Issues

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  51. 04-Jan-2014

    Settlement

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  52. 30-Nov-2013

    Settlement

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  53. 12-Nov-2013

    Settlement

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  54. 28-Oct-2013

    Settlement

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  55. 11-Oct-2013

    Settlement

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  56. 20-Sep-2013

    Issues

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  57. 29-Aug-2013

    Issues

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  58. 12-Aug-2013

    Summons

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  59. 16-Jul-2013

    Summons

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  60. 04-Jun-2013

    Summons

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  61. 22-Apr-2013

    Summons

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  62. 08-Apr-2013

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  63. 08-Apr-2013

    Case filed

    Registration No. 104/2013

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: OS No. 104/2013 Outcome: Application dismissed; case to proceed to plaintiff's evidence The court rejected the plaintiffs' application to withdraw the suit with liberty to file a fresh one, finding they failed to establish any formal defect or sufficient grounds required under Order XXIII Rule 1(3) CPC. The alleged inconsistencies between pleadings, documents, and reliefs pertain to case merits rather than procedural defects. Despite High Court directions to specify technical reasons, the plaintiffs merely reiterated plaint averments without concrete particulars, necessitating the suit proceed to evidence phase. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case