SMT.JAYAMMA K vs THE GENERAL MANAGER SMT.B.L.RANISAMYUKTHA — 82/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U,O,7,RULE,1,OF,CPC. Status: Orders. Next hearing: 27th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KACD510003262025
Filing Number
82/2025
Filing Date
11-Feb-2025
Registration No
82/2025
Registration Date
11-Feb-2025
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HOSDURGA
Judge
241-Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SMT.JAYAMMA K
Adv. MYLARAPPA T.B.
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE GENERAL MANAGER SMT.B.L.RANISAMYUKTHA
-
2.SMT.B.L.RANI SAMYUKTHA
Case History
-
27-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
19-Jun-2026
Orders
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
15-Jun-2026
OrdersView PDF
Case Summary: OS No. 82/2025 Outcome: The defendants' application for temporary injunction (IA No.V) under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 of the CPC has been dismissed as not maintainable. The court found that defendants cannot seek injunction relief under Clause (c) of Order XXXIX Rule 1 in a suit filed by the plaintiff; they must file a separate suit for such relief. Key Issue: The court applied High Court precedent guidelines establishing that injunction applications under Order XXXIX Rule 1(b) and (c) are available only to plaintiffs, not defendants in plaintiff-filed suits, regardless of whether their right arises from the same cause of action. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Jun-2026
Orders
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
09-Jun-2026
Orders
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
01-Jun-2026
Hearing
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
29-Apr-2026
Orders
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
18-Mar-2026
Orders
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
21-Feb-2026
Orders
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
07-Feb-2026
Hearing
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
04-Feb-2026
Objection
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
27-Jan-2026
Objection
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
20-Jan-2026
Hearing On I.A.
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
17-Jan-2026
Hearing On I.A.
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Dec-2025
Hearing On I.A.
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
03-Dec-2025
Hearing On I.A.
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
14-Nov-2025
Hearing On I.A.
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
13-Oct-2025
Hearing On I.A.
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
27-Sep-2025
Hearing On I.A.
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
06-Sep-2025
Hearing On I.A.
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
28-Jul-2025
Hearing On I.A.
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
11-Jun-2025
Hearing On I.A.
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
19-Mar-2025
Hearing On I.A.
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
12-Feb-2025
Summons
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
11-Feb-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Feb-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 82/2025
Case Summary: OS No. 82/2025 Outcome: The defendants' application for temporary injunction (IA No.V) under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 of the CPC has been dismissed as not maintainable. The court found that defendants cannot seek injunction relief under Clause (c) of Order XXXIX Rule 1 in a suit filed by the plaintiff; they must file a separate suit for such relief. Key Issue: The court applied High Court precedent guidelines establishing that injunction applications under Order XXXIX Rule 1(b) and (c) are available only to plaintiffs, not defendants in plaintiff-filed suits, regardless of whether their right arises from the same cause of action. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts