HARISHA vs PAPAIAH — 1037/2023

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Status: Orders. Next hearing: 01st July 2026.

Orders Next hearing 01-Jul-2026

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KACD410016682023

Filing Number

1037/2023

Filing Date

23-Nov-2023

Registration No

1037/2023

Registration Date

23-Nov-2023

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,HOLALKERE

Judge

563-Sr. Civil Judge and jmfc, Holalkere

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HARISHA

    Adv. L.K. SHIVAKUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PAPAIAH

  2. 2.THE GENERAL MANAGER, BHARATHI AXA GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD.

Case History

  1. 01-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 29-Apr-2026

    Orders

    Sr. Civil Judge and jmfc, Holalkere

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Sr. Civil Judge and jmfc, Holalkere

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Sr. Civil Judge and jmfc, Holalkere

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Sr. Civil Judge and jmfc, Holalkere

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Sr. Civil Judge and jmfc, Holalkere

  7. 14-Mar-2026

    Restored

    Sr. Civil Judge and jmfc, Holalkere

  8. 14-Mar-2026

    Settlement

    Sr. Civil Judge and jmfc, Holalkere

  9. 14-Mar-2026

    Settlement

    Sr. Civil Judge and jmfc, Holalkere

  10. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Sr. Civil Judge and jmfc, Holalkere

  11. 29-Dec-2025

    Orders

    Sr. Civil Judge and jmfc, Holalkere

  12. 08-Oct-2025

    Orders

    Sr. Civil Judge and jmfc, Holalkere

  13. 16-Jul-2025

    Orders

    Sr. Civil Judge and jmfc, Holalkere

  14. 04-Jun-2025

    Orders

    Sr. Civil Judge and jmfc, Holalkere

  15. 02-Apr-2025

    Orders

    Sr. Civil Judge and jmfc, Holalkere

  16. 29-Jan-2025

    Orders

    Sr. Civil Judge and jmfc, Holalkere

  17. 04-Dec-2024

    Orders

    Sr. Civil Judge and jmfc, Holalkere

  18. 01-Oct-2024

    Orders

    Sr. Civil Judge and jmfc, Holalkere

  19. 13-Aug-2024

    Issues

    Sr. Civil Judge and jmfc, Holalkere

  20. 03-Aug-2024

    Issues

    Sr. Civil Judge and jmfc, Holalkere

  21. 05-Jun-2024

    Objection

    Sr. Civil Judge and jmfc, Holalkere

  22. 24-Apr-2024

    Objection

    Sr. Civil Judge and jmfc, Holalkere

  23. 21-Mar-2024

    OrdersView PDF

    Case Summary: MVC No. 1037/2023 Court: Senior Civil Judge & AMACT, Holalkere Parties: Harisha (Petitioner) v. P. Papaiah & General Manager, Bharathi AXA General Insurance Co. Ltd. (Respondents) Outcome: The court rejected the insurance company's plea to dismiss the petition for being time-barred and allowed the petitioner's application to condone the delay. The delay of 3 months 20 days in filing the motor vehicle accident claim petition (filed 08-11-2023 for an accident on 19-01-2023) was condoned under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, as the Motor Vehicle Act is a beneficial statute and the petitioner's reasons—ongoing medical treatment, shock, document collection delays, and police charge sheet delays—were found acceptable by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  24. 21-Mar-2024

    Objection

    Sr. Civil Judge and jmfc, Holalkere

  25. 14-Feb-2024

    Orders

    Sr. Civil Judge and jmfc, Holalkere

  26. 07-Feb-2024

    Orders

    Sr. Civil Judge and jmfc, Holalkere

  27. 22-Jan-2024

    Summons

    Sr. Civil Judge and jmfc, Holalkere

  28. 23-Nov-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 23-Nov-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1037/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MVC No. 1037/2023 Court: Senior Civil Judge & AMACT, Holalkere Parties: Harisha (Petitioner) v. P. Papaiah & General Manager, Bharathi AXA General Insurance Co. Ltd. (Respondents) Outcome: The court rejected the insurance company's plea to dismiss the petition for being time-barred and allowed the petitioner's application to condone the delay. The delay of 3 months 20 days in filing the motor vehicle accident claim petition (filed 08-11-2023 for an accident on 19-01-2023) was condoned under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, as the Motor Vehicle Act is a beneficial statute and the petitioner's reasons—ongoing medical treatment, shock, document collection delays, and police charge sheet delays—were found acceptable by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case