MADHUKARANANDA vs M. MANJUNATHAPPA Advocate - M.N. CHANDRAKANTH — 457/2024
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 05th August 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KACD410007592024
Filing Number
423/2024
Filing Date
30-May-2024
Registration No
457/2024
Registration Date
30-May-2024
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,HOLALKERE
Judge
563-Sr. Civil Judge and jmfc, Holalkere
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MADHUKARANANDA
Adv. N.H. KENGAPPA
Respondent(s)
-
1.M. MANJUNATHAPPA Advocate - M.N. CHANDRAKANTH
-
2.THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, CHITRADURGA.
Adv. P. NANJUNDAPPA
Case History
-
05-Aug-2026
Next hearingPending
-
10-Jun-2026
Evidence
Sr. Civil Judge and jmfc, Holalkere
-
29-Apr-2026
Evidence
Sr. Civil Judge and jmfc, Holalkere
-
18-Mar-2026
Evidence
Sr. Civil Judge and jmfc, Holalkere
-
18-Feb-2026
Evidence
Sr. Civil Judge and jmfc, Holalkere
-
17-Dec-2025
Evidence
Sr. Civil Judge and jmfc, Holalkere
-
29-Oct-2025
Evidence
Sr. Civil Judge and jmfc, Holalkere
-
17-Sep-2025
DepositionView PDF
Case Summary: 457/2024 Outcome: The court examined evidence in this motor vehicle injury compensation case. A witness (Dr. M. Manjunath) testified on 17-09-2025 regarding treatment of the petitioner (Madhukarananda) who sustained a bone fracture. The witness confirmed administering physiotherapy, medications, and issuing a disability certificate dated 23.04.2025. Cross-examination revealed significant discrepancies: the doctor issued a disability certificate despite finding no actual disability, admitted to issuing false certificates in other cases for higher compensation, and failed to review critical hospital records before issuing the certificate. The court found the witness's testimony unreliable and questioned the validity of the disability certificate presented as evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Sep-2025
Evidence
Sr. Civil Judge and jmfc, Holalkere
-
06-Aug-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
06-Aug-2025
Evidence
Sr. Civil Judge and jmfc, Holalkere
-
18-Jun-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
18-Jun-2025
Evidence
Sr. Civil Judge and jmfc, Holalkere
-
28-May-2025
Evidence
Sr. Civil Judge and jmfc, Holalkere
-
23-Apr-2025
Evidence
Sr. Civil Judge and jmfc, Holalkere
-
16-Apr-2025
Evidence
Sr. Civil Judge and jmfc, Holalkere
-
02-Apr-2025
Evidence
Sr. Civil Judge and jmfc, Holalkere
-
19-Mar-2025
Evidence
Sr. Civil Judge and jmfc, Holalkere
-
31-Jan-2025
Evidence
Sr. Civil Judge and jmfc, Holalkere
-
25-Jan-2025
Issues
Sr. Civil Judge and jmfc, Holalkere
-
22-Jan-2025
Issues
Sr. Civil Judge and jmfc, Holalkere
-
19-Dec-2024
Settlement
Sr. Civil Judge and jmfc, Holalkere
-
14-Dec-2024
Settlement
Sr. Civil Judge and jmfc, Holalkere
-
12-Dec-2024
Settlement
Sr. Civil Judge and jmfc, Holalkere
-
11-Dec-2024
Settlement
Sr. Civil Judge and jmfc, Holalkere
-
27-Nov-2024
Settlement
Sr. Civil Judge and jmfc, Holalkere
-
13-Nov-2024
Settlement
Sr. Civil Judge and jmfc, Holalkere
-
25-Sep-2024
Notice
Sr. Civil Judge and jmfc, Holalkere
-
05-Aug-2024
Objection
Sr. Civil Judge and jmfc, Holalkere
-
30-May-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-May-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 457/2024
Case Summary: 457/2024 Outcome: The court examined evidence in this motor vehicle injury compensation case. A witness (Dr. M. Manjunath) testified on 17-09-2025 regarding treatment of the petitioner (Madhukarananda) who sustained a bone fracture. The witness confirmed administering physiotherapy, medications, and issuing a disability certificate dated 23.04.2025. Cross-examination revealed significant discrepancies: the doctor issued a disability certificate despite finding no actual disability, admitted to issuing false certificates in other cases for higher compensation, and failed to review critical hospital records before issuing the certificate. The court found the witness's testimony unreliable and questioned the validity of the disability certificate presented as evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts