SHARADAMMA vs CHANNABASAMMA — 306/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/S,26,AND,U/O,7,RULE,1,AND,ORDER,34,RULE,7,OF,CPC. Status: Additional W/S. Next hearing: 07th July 2026.

Additional W/S Next hearing 07-Jul-2026

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KACD320017692023

Filing Number

306/2023

Filing Date

22-Nov-2023

Registration No

306/2023

Registration Date

22-Nov-2023

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HIRIYUR

Judge

236-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/S,26,AND,U/O,7,RULE,1,AND,ORDER,34,RULE,7,OF,CPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHARADAMMA

    Adv. R.BASAVARAJA

  2. 2.H.B.THIPPESWAMY

  3. 3.SARVAMANGALA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CHANNABASAMMA

  2. 2.H.S.NAGARAJU

  3. 3.SINDHU

  4. 4.H.S.GANGAMMA

  5. 5.MUTHU H.S.

  6. 6.H.S.CHIDANANDA

Case History

  1. 07-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 11-Jun-2026

    Additional W/S

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  3. 24-Apr-2026

    Additional W/S

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Objections

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  5. 06-Feb-2026

    Ammended Plaint

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  6. 29-Jan-2026

    Ammended Plaint

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  7. 12-Jan-2026

    Summons

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  8. 19-Dec-2025

    Summons

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  9. 08-Dec-2025

    Summons

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  10. 14-Nov-2025

    Summons

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  11. 25-Oct-2025

    Summons

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  12. 25-Sep-2025

    Orders

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  13. 29-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  14. 04-Aug-2025

    Objections

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  15. 13-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  16. 25-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  17. 17-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  18. 09-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  19. 02-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  20. 15-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  21. 03-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  22. 19-Aug-2024

    Issues

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  23. 12-Aug-2024

    Issues

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  24. 16-Jul-2024

    Issues

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  25. 21-Jun-2024

    OrdersView PDF

    Case 306/2023 Summary: Plaintiffs Sharadamma, H.B. Thippeswamy, and Sarvamangala sought ad-interim temporary injunction to prevent defendants from interfering with mortgaged property pending redemption of a 2005 mortgage deed. The court rejected the injunction application, finding plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable injury. The court noted plaintiffs remain in possession with no demonstrated interference by defendants. I.A. No.I dismissed with costs of Rs.200. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  26. 21-Jun-2024

    Issues

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  27. 12-Jun-2024

    Summons

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  28. 29-May-2024

    Summons

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  29. 27-Apr-2024

    Hearing

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  30. 27-Mar-2024

    Hearing

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  31. 16-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  32. 16-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  33. 15-Dec-2023

    Summons

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  34. 24-Nov-2023

    Summons

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  35. 22-Nov-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  36. 22-Nov-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 306/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case 306/2023 Summary: Plaintiffs Sharadamma, H.B. Thippeswamy, and Sarvamangala sought ad-interim temporary injunction to prevent defendants from interfering with mortgaged property pending redemption of a 2005 mortgage deed. The court rejected the injunction application, finding plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable injury. The court noted plaintiffs remain in possession with no demonstrated interference by defendants. I.A. No.I dismissed with costs of Rs.200. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case