N.DEVEGOWDA vs PANCHAYATH DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, IKKANUR GRAMA PANCHAYATH, IKKANURU — 120/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7,RULE,1. Disposed: Contested--DECREED OTHERWISE on 04th April 2026.

Case disposed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KACD320013612022

Filing Number

120/2022

Filing Date

22-Apr-2022

Registration No

120/2022

Registration Date

22-Apr-2022

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HIRIYUR

Judge

236-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

Decision Date

04-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DECREED OTHERWISE

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 7,RULE,1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.N.DEVEGOWDA

    Adv. B.N.THIPPESWAMY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PANCHAYATH DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, IKKANUR GRAMA PANCHAYATH, IKKANURU

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Apr-2026

    JudgmentView PDF

    The court partially decreed the plaintiff's suit for permanent injunction. The court found that while the plaintiff established possession of his agricultural land (8 acres in Survey No. 269), the defendant—the Panchayath Development Officer—failed to prove the existence of a 100-foot public road on the property, only a 6-7 foot footpath being shown on village maps. The court permanently restrained the defendant from forming a new 100-foot wide road without lawful land acquisition, but clarified the plaintiff cannot obstruct public use of the existing footpath. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  4. 27-Mar-2026

    Judgments

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Judgments

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Judgments

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    Judgments

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  8. 10-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  9. 04-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  10. 30-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  11. 24-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  12. 20-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  13. 14-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  14. 07-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  15. 16-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  16. 03-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  17. 17-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  18. 04-Nov-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  19. 04-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  20. 16-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  21. 21-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  22. 09-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  23. 26-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  24. 12-Mar-2025

    Arguments

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  25. 11-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  26. 09-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  27. 19-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  28. 21-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  29. 28-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  30. 23-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  31. 24-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  32. 30-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  33. 04-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  34. 07-Jun-2024

    DepositionView PDF

  35. 07-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  36. 03-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  37. 13-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  38. 08-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  39. 05-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  40. 14-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  41. 10-Nov-2023

    DepositionView PDF

  42. 10-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  43. 06-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  44. 31-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  45. 04-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  46. 23-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  47. 20-Apr-2023

    Hearing On I.A.

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  48. 17-Mar-2023

    Hearing On I.A.

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  49. 09-Feb-2023

    Hearing On I.A.

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  50. 02-Jan-2023

    Hearing

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  51. 19-Nov-2022

    Hearing

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  52. 14-Oct-2022

    Objections

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  53. 26-Aug-2022

    Objections

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  54. 22-Jul-2022

    Objections

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  55. 24-Jun-2022

    Summons

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  56. 31-May-2022

    Summons

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  57. 22-Apr-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  58. 22-Apr-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 120/2022

casestatus.in Summary

The court partially decreed the plaintiff's suit for permanent injunction. The court found that while the plaintiff established possession of his agricultural land (8 acres in Survey No. 269), the defendant—the Panchayath Development Officer—failed to prove the existence of a 100-foot public road on the property, only a 6-7 foot footpath being shown on village maps. The court permanently restrained the defendant from forming a new 100-foot wide road without lawful land acquisition, but clarified the plaintiff cannot obstruct public use of the existing footpath. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case