PORANNA @ PARVATHAIAH vs CHOWDAMMA — 256/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section UO7RULE1CPC. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KACD220033922021
Filing Number
256/2021
Filing Date
04-Dec-2021
Registration No
256/2021
Registration Date
04-Dec-2021
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHALLAKERE
Judge
234-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PORANNA @ PARVATHAIAH
Adv. D.JAYASEELA REDDY
Respondent(s)
-
1.CHOWDAMMA
-
2.SIDDAPPA
-
3.MAHANTESH
-
4.GANGAMMA
-
5.SADANANDA
-
6.KOTRESH
-
7.SHAKUNTHALAMMA
-
8.THIPPEERAMMA
-
9.THIPPERUDRA
-
10.SHANTHAMMA
-
11.THIPPAIAH
-
12.SUMAKKA
-
13.VISHALAKSHI
-
14.MALA
-
15.BASAMMA
-
16.SIDDAPPA
Case History
-
30-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
05-Jun-2026
DepositionView PDF
Case Summary: OS 256/2021 Petitioner: PORANNA @ PARVATHAIAH Respondents: CHOWDAMMA, SIDDAPPA, MAHANTESH (and others) Date: 05.06.2026 Outcome The petition was dismissed. The court found that the petitioner failed to substantiate claims of ownership and inheritance rights to the disputed property (Survey No. 86, comprising 31 acres 21 guntas). The court determined that respondents 1-3 possess valid inheritance rights to the property through legitimate succession, and that the petitioner lacked documentary evidence establishing superior ownership claims or rights to any portion of the contested land. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Jun-2026
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
24-Apr-2026
Objections
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
18-Mar-2026
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
18-Feb-2026
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
14-Jan-2026
Orders
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
02-Dec-2025
Hearing
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
24-Nov-2025
Hearing
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
04-Nov-2025
Objections
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
08-Oct-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Sep-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
28-Aug-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
15-Jul-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
15-Jul-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
03-Jun-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
07-Apr-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
11-Feb-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Dec-2024
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
25-Oct-2024
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
23-Sep-2024
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
09-Aug-2024
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
05-Jul-2024
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
25-Apr-2024
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
21-Feb-2024
DepositionView PDF
-
21-Feb-2024
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
04-Jan-2024
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
05-Dec-2023
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
07-Nov-2023
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
10-Oct-2023
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
25-Sep-2023
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
17-Aug-2023
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
07-Aug-2023
Amendment/Amended plaint/petition
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
06-Jul-2023
Steps
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
06-Jun-2023
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
22-May-2023
Issues
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
30-Mar-2023
Rejoinder
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
09-Mar-2023
Rejoinder
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
08-Mar-2023
Call On
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
24-Jan-2023
Call On
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
06-Dec-2022
Summons
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
20-Oct-2022
Summons
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
29-Aug-2022
Summons
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
28-Jul-2022
Summons
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
27-Jun-2022
Summons
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
15-Jun-2022
Summons
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
19-Mar-2022
Summons
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
13-Jan-2022
Written Statement
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
04-Dec-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Dec-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 256/2021
Case Summary: OS 256/2021 Petitioner: PORANNA @ PARVATHAIAH Respondents: CHOWDAMMA, SIDDAPPA, MAHANTESH (and others) Date: 05.06.2026 Outcome The petition was dismissed. The court found that the petitioner failed to substantiate claims of ownership and inheritance rights to the disputed property (Survey No. 86, comprising 31 acres 21 guntas). The court determined that respondents 1-3 possess valid inheritance rights to the property through legitimate succession, and that the petitioner lacked documentary evidence establishing superior ownership claims or rights to any portion of the contested land. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts