MALLIKARJUNA vs THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KPTCL, CHITRADURGA — 465/2022

Case under Indian Telegraph Act Section 16,(3). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 29th July 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 29-Jul-2026

Misc - Miscellaneous Cases

CNR: KACD010052012022

Filing Number

465/2022

Filing Date

21-Nov-2022

Registration No

465/2022

Registration Date

21-Nov-2022

Court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, CHITRADURGA

Judge

229-Addl. District And Sessions Judge

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Telegraph Act Section 16,(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MALLIKARJUNA

    Adv. KHALID AHAMED

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KPTCL, CHITRADURGA

  2. 2.THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, CHITRADURGA

  3. 3.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, BESCOM, CHITRADURGA

Case History

  1. 29-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 02-May-2026

    Evidence

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  4. 20-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  5. 29-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  6. 06-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  7. 07-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  8. 17-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  9. 15-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  10. 12-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  11. 14-Aug-2025

    Arguments

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  12. 05-Aug-2025

    Arguments

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  13. 19-Jul-2025

    Arguments

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  14. 18-Jul-2025

    Arguments

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  15. 27-Jun-2025

    Arguments

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  16. 21-Jun-2025

    Arguments

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  17. 10-Jun-2025

    Arguments

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  18. 22-Mar-2025

    Arguments

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  19. 10-Mar-2025

    Arguments

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  20. 28-Feb-2025

    DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: C.Misc. 465/2022 Order Date: 28/02/2025 The petitioner Mallikarjuna's witness was examined and sworn in. The petitioner's counsel (K.A.) presented the main examination, with the witness affirming the truthfulness of the affidavit and its contents. Documentary evidence including notices, postal acknowledgments, receipts, survey documents, photographs, and 2023-24 market value guidelines (marked as Exhibits NIP-1 to NIP-14) were produced and admitted. Cross-examination by the respondents' counsel (G.M.S.) was noted as absent, and no further examination was conducted. The case proceedings were concluded at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  21. 28-Feb-2025

    Arguments

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  22. 07-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  23. 05-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  24. 06-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  25. 21-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  26. 20-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  27. 18-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  28. 30-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  29. 22-Aug-2023

    Objection

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  30. 08-Jun-2023

    Objection

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  31. 10-Apr-2023

    Objection

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  32. 06-Mar-2023

    Objection

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  33. 18-Jan-2023

    Objection

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  34. 22-Nov-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  35. 21-Nov-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 465/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.Misc. 465/2022 Order Date: 28/02/2025 The petitioner Mallikarjuna's witness was examined and sworn in. The petitioner's counsel (K.A.) presented the main examination, with the witness affirming the truthfulness of the affidavit and its contents. Documentary evidence including notices, postal acknowledgments, receipts, survey documents, photographs, and 2023-24 market value guidelines (marked as Exhibits NIP-1 to NIP-14) were produced and admitted. Cross-examination by the respondents' counsel (G.M.S.) was noted as absent, and no further examination was conducted. The case proceedings were concluded at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case