THIMMAKKA vs THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER- KPTCL- CHITRADURGA. — 373/2022

Case under Indian Telegraph Act Section 16,(3). Status: Further Arguments. Next hearing: 27th June 2026.

Further Arguments Next hearing 27-Jun-2026

Misc - Miscellaneous Cases

CNR: KACD010039102022

Filing Number

373/2022

Filing Date

01-Sep-2022

Registration No

373/2022

Registration Date

01-Sep-2022

Court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, CHITRADURGA

Judge

229-Addl. District And Sessions Judge

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Telegraph Act Section 16,(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THIMMAKKA

    Adv. R. BHIMESH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER- KPTCL- CHITRADURGA.

  2. 2.THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER- KPCTL CHITRADURGA.

Case History

  1. 27-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Further Arguments

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  3. 02-May-2026

    Orders.

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  4. 22-Apr-2026

    Orders.

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Orders.

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Orders.

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  7. 02-Feb-2026

    Orders.

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  8. 09-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  9. 02-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  10. 13-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  11. 17-Oct-2025

    DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: C.Misc. 373/2022 - THIMMAKKA v. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KPTCL Outcome: The petition is partly allowed. The court directed the respondent (KPTCL) to pay compensation to the petitioner for damages caused by the unauthorized laying of a 220 KV high-tension power line on her land. The court ordered payment of Rs. 86,822/- for the loss of a coconut tree and an additional Rs. 1,27,304/- for diminution in land value. The respondent is also directed to issue a newspaper notification before energizing the line and to obtain a separate proper order from the District Magistrate specifically authorizing the line construction on the petitioner's property, including survey and boundary demarcation as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  12. 17-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  13. 13-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  14. 12-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  15. 14-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  16. 05-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  17. 25-Jul-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  18. 25-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  19. 14-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  20. 30-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  21. 24-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  22. 10-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  23. 16-Dec-2024

    DepositionView PDF

  24. 16-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  25. 19-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  26. 18-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  27. 13-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  28. 08-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  29. 22-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  30. 21-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  31. 18-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  32. 30-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  33. 17-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  34. 04-Jul-2023

    Objection

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  35. 17-Apr-2023

    Objection

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  36. 08-Feb-2023

    Objection

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  37. 13-Dec-2022

    Objection

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  38. 21-Oct-2022

    Call On

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  39. 02-Sep-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  40. 01-Sep-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 373/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.Misc. 373/2022 - THIMMAKKA v. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KPTCL Outcome: The petition is partly allowed. The court directed the respondent (KPTCL) to pay compensation to the petitioner for damages caused by the unauthorized laying of a 220 KV high-tension power line on her land. The court ordered payment of Rs. 86,822/- for the loss of a coconut tree and an additional Rs. 1,27,304/- for diminution in land value. The respondent is also directed to issue a newspaper notification before energizing the line and to obtain a separate proper order from the District Magistrate specifically authorizing the line construction on the petitioner's property, including survey and boundary demarcation as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case