K.S.R. BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS. BY PARTNERS 1.K.SRINATH REDDY vs JAYAMMA - TOLASAMMA — 16/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26,4,1,7,1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 09th July 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 09-Jul-2026

Com.O.S. - COMMERCIAL ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KACD010027042025

Filing Number

15/2025

Filing Date

03-Jul-2025

Registration No

16/2025

Registration Date

03-Jul-2025

Court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, CHITRADURGA

Judge

228-Prl. District And Sessions Judge

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26,4,1,7,1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.K.S.R. BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS. BY PARTNERS 1.K.SRINATH REDDY

    Adv. H.S. MANJUNATH

  2. 2.K.S.R. BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS. PARTNER No.2 K.HARSHA REDDY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JAYAMMA - TOLASAMMA

  2. 2.K.S. MANJUNATH

  3. 3.K.S.BHARATHENDRA KUMAR

  4. 4.K.S.NAGARAJ

  5. 5.K.S. ARUN KUMAR

Case History

  1. 09-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  3. 21-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  5. 21-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  6. 30-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  7. 12-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  8. 18-Dec-2025

    OrdersView PDF

    Case Summary: COM OS No. 16/2025 Outcome: The court dismissed the defendants' (No. 2-5) application challenging jurisdiction with costs of Rs. 3,000 payable to the plaintiff. The court held that KSR Builders' suit for specific performance of a property sale agreement falls within the Commercial Courts Act's definition of "commercial dispute" since the plaintiff is a commercial venture engaged in real estate development, making the transaction inherently commercial in nature. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  9. 18-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  10. 06-Dec-2025

    Orders

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  11. 01-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  12. 17-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  13. 10-Nov-2025

    Objection

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  14. 05-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  15. 18-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  16. 08-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  17. 17-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  18. 08-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  19. 29-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  20. 23-Aug-2025

    Issues

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  21. 07-Aug-2025

    Summons

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  22. 02-Aug-2025

    Summons

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  23. 03-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  24. 03-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 16/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: COM OS No. 16/2025 Outcome: The court dismissed the defendants' (No. 2-5) application challenging jurisdiction with costs of Rs. 3,000 payable to the plaintiff. The court held that KSR Builders' suit for specific performance of a property sale agreement falls within the Commercial Courts Act's definition of "commercial dispute" since the plaintiff is a commercial venture engaged in real estate development, making the transaction inherently commercial in nature. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case