YALLAPPA vs HOSADURGA PS — 291/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 27th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KACD010012102026
e-Filing Number
16-03-2026
Filing Number
294/2026
Filing Date
16-Mar-2026
Registration No
291/2026
Registration Date
16-Mar-2026
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, CHITRADURGA
Judge
228-Prl. District And Sessions Judge
Decision Date
27-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
155
Police Station
HOSADURGA PS
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.YALLAPPA
Adv. DHANANJAYA R
-
2.MANJUNATHA T
Adv. DHANANJAYA R
Respondent(s)
-
1.HOSADURGA PS (Police Station)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
Case Summary: Crl.Misc.291/2026 The court granted anticipatory bail to Yallappa and Manjunath T., accused of illegal sand mining under the Mines and Minerals Development Act, finding insufficient prima facie evidence of their involvement. The judge noted that despite the accused being named in the FIR complaint, they were omitted from the FIR itself, and the prosecution failed to produce supporting documentation such as seizure reports or mahazars to corroborate the allegations. The accused were released on personal bonds of Rs. 50,000 each with sureties, subject to conditions including cooperation with investigation, non-tampering with evidence, and appearance before court within thirty days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Mar-2026
Disposed
Prl. District And Sessions Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 291/2026
Case Summary: Crl.Misc.291/2026 The court granted anticipatory bail to Yallappa and Manjunath T., accused of illegal sand mining under the Mines and Minerals Development Act, finding insufficient prima facie evidence of their involvement. The judge noted that despite the accused being named in the FIR complaint, they were omitted from the FIR itself, and the prosecution failed to produce supporting documentation such as seizure reports or mahazars to corroborate the allegations. The accused were released on personal bonds of Rs. 50,000 each with sureties, subject to conditions including cooperation with investigation, non-tampering with evidence, and appearance before court within thirty days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts