MOHAMMED AMAR vs CHITRADURGA TOWN PS — 285/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KACD010011792026

e-Filing Number

13-03-2026

Filing Number

288/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

285/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, CHITRADURGA

Judge

228-Prl. District And Sessions Judge

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

28

Police Station

CHITRADURGA TOWN PS

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOHAMMED AMAR

    Adv. SYED AHAMED RIZWAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CHITRADURGA TOWN PS (Police Station)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Case Summary: Mohammed Amar v. Chitradurga Town PS (Case 285/2026) The court granted bail to Mohammed Amar, who was accused of assaulting a mobile shop owner with a knife during a dispute over phone display pricing, causing injuries to both the shopkeeper and his brother. The court found that while the prosecution alleged serious offences under BNS Sections 109 and 352, the medical evidence showed only minor injuries (outpatient treatment), no prior criminal record existed, and the accused had deep roots in the community, making absconding unlikely. The court ordered his release on a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 with conditions including bi-weekly police station attendance and a prohibition against witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 285/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Mohammed Amar v. Chitradurga Town PS (Case 285/2026) The court granted bail to Mohammed Amar, who was accused of assaulting a mobile shop owner with a knife during a dispute over phone display pricing, causing injuries to both the shopkeeper and his brother. The court found that while the prosecution alleged serious offences under BNS Sections 109 and 352, the medical evidence showed only minor injuries (outpatient treatment), no prior criminal record existed, and the accused had deep roots in the community, making absconding unlikely. The court ordered his release on a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 with conditions including bi-weekly police station attendance and a prohibition against witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case