MARULASIDDAPPA G.V. vs BHARAMASAGAR PS — 253/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 18th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KACD010009452026
Filing Number
258/2026
Filing Date
06-Mar-2026
Registration No
253/2026
Registration Date
06-Mar-2026
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, CHITRADURGA
Judge
228-Prl. District And Sessions Judge
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
68
Police Station
BHARAMASAGAR PS
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MARULASIDDAPPA G.V.
Adv. Y. THIPPESWAMY
-
2.E. SAVITHA
-
3.K.M. BASAVARAJAPPA
-
4.MALLIKARJUNA
-
5.NAGARAJA
Respondent(s)
-
1.BHARAMASAGAR PS (Police Station)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
The court granted anticipatory bail to all five accused persons in a case involving alleged assault, abuse, and outraging of modesty of a woman on 19.02.2026. The judge found that the offences were not punishable with death or life imprisonment, the accused were permanent residents with no criminal history, and crucially, there were two competing FIRs filed on the same day suggesting potential counter-allegations, making it difficult to determine aggression at this stage. The bail was approved on personal bonds of Rs. 50,000 each with surety and strict conditions including cooperation with investigation, non-tampering of evidence, and no further unlawful acts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
Prl. District And Sessions Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Orders
Prl. District And Sessions Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
Prl. District And Sessions Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 253/2026
The court granted anticipatory bail to all five accused persons in a case involving alleged assault, abuse, and outraging of modesty of a woman on 19.02.2026. The judge found that the offences were not punishable with death or life imprisonment, the accused were permanent residents with no criminal history, and crucially, there were two competing FIRs filed on the same day suggesting potential counter-allegations, making it difficult to determine aggression at this stage. The bail was approved on personal bonds of Rs. 50,000 each with surety and strict conditions including cooperation with investigation, non-tampering of evidence, and no further unlawful acts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts