PRABHAKARA.J.P. vs HOSADURGA PS — 273/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 26th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KACD010007322026
Filing Number
189/2026
Filing Date
18-Feb-2026
Registration No
273/2026
Registration Date
11-Mar-2026
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, CHITRADURGA
Judge
228-Prl. District And Sessions Judge
Decision Date
26-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
499
Police Station
HOSADURGA PS
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PRABHAKARA.J.P.
Adv. N. MAHESH
Respondent(s)
-
1.HOSADURGA PS (Police Station)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
26-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
Case Summary: 273/2026 - PRABHAKARA.J.P. v. HOSADURGA PS The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Chitradurga granted anticipatory bail to J.P. Prabhakara on March 26, 2026, in a temple theft case (Cr.No.499/2025) involving theft of Rs.45,000-50,000 from a hundi. The court found insufficient independent evidence linking the accused to the crime beyond statements of two co-accused (who had already been granted bail), and determined the offences under Sections 305 and 331(4) of BNS were not capital offences. Bail was granted on execution of a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000 with two sureties and multiple conditions including cooperation with investigation, appearance before court within 30 days, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-Mar-2026
Disposed
Prl. District And Sessions Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Orders
Prl. District And Sessions Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 273/2026
Case Summary: 273/2026 - PRABHAKARA.J.P. v. HOSADURGA PS The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Chitradurga granted anticipatory bail to J.P. Prabhakara on March 26, 2026, in a temple theft case (Cr.No.499/2025) involving theft of Rs.45,000-50,000 from a hundi. The court found insufficient independent evidence linking the accused to the crime beyond statements of two co-accused (who had already been granted bail), and determined the offences under Sections 305 and 331(4) of BNS were not capital offences. Bail was granted on execution of a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000 with two sureties and multiple conditions including cooperation with investigation, appearance before court within 30 days, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts