Sakamma vs The Thasildar — 2258/2025
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 01st July 2026.
Crl.Misc. - Criminal MISC CASES
CNR: KACB310088432025
e-Filing Number
20-12-2025
Filing Number
2258/2025
Filing Date
26-Dec-2025
Registration No
2258/2025
Registration Date
26-Dec-2025
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHINTAMANI
Judge
385-Addl Civil Judge and JMFC Chintamani
Decision Date
01-Jul-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Last updated 03-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sakamma
Adv. S.N. SURESH BABU
-
2.Shanthamma
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Thasildar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Jul-2026
OrdersView PDF
The Additional Civil Judge and JMFC Chintamani allowed the petition filed by Sakamma and Shanthamma under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act against the Thasildar. The court granted relief to the petitioners through an "Allowed Otherwise" disposal order, though specific factual details and reasoning are not provided in the judgment document. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Jul-2026
Disposed
Addl Civil Judge and JMFC Chintamani
-
18-Jun-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
18-Jun-2026
Orders
Addl Civil Judge and JMFC Chintamani
-
08-Apr-2026
Summons
Addl Civil Judge and JMFC Chintamani
-
24-Mar-2026
Summons
Addl Civil Judge and JMFC Chintamani
-
13-Mar-2026
Orders
Addl Civil Judge and JMFC Chintamani
-
12-Mar-2026
Orders
Addl Civil Judge and JMFC Chintamani
-
05-Feb-2026
Notice
Addl Civil Judge and JMFC Chintamani
-
06-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 2258/2025
The Additional Civil Judge and JMFC Chintamani allowed the petition filed by Sakamma and Shanthamma under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act against the Thasildar. The court granted relief to the petitioners through an "Allowed Otherwise" disposal order, though specific factual details and reasoning are not provided in the judgment document. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts