J.H.Nagabhushana vs D1 Malini.B — 277/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/s,26,Order7,Rule1and2. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED BY ADR on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KACB300006762025

Filing Number

280/2025

Filing Date

20-Nov-2025

Registration No

277/2025

Registration Date

20-Nov-2025

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHINTAMANI

Judge

383-Sr Civil Judge and JMFC Chintamani

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED BY ADR

Last updated 03-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/s,26,Order7,Rule1and2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.J.H.Nagabhushana

    Adv. MANJUNATHAREDDY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.D1 Malini.B

  2. 2.D2 Arham Ahamadh

  3. 3.D3 Ameen Ahmadh Rep by his mother Malini.B

  4. 4.D4 Aliya Rep by her mother Malini.B

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Case Summary: OS 277/2025 The court accepted the compromise petition filed by both parties in this suit for specific performance of a contract dated 23.11.2023. The court found the compromise to be lawful and decreed the suit in accordance with the agreed terms, with the compromise petition forming part of the final decree. Court fees were ordered to be refunded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Sr Civil Judge and JMFC Chintamani

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Summons

    Sr Civil Judge and JMFC Chintamani

  5. 17-Jan-2026

    Summons

    Sr Civil Judge and JMFC Chintamani

  6. 16-Jan-2026

    Summons

    Sr Civil Judge and JMFC Chintamani

  7. 18-Dec-2025

    Summons

    Sr Civil Judge and JMFC Chintamani

  8. 20-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 20-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 277/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: OS 277/2025 The court accepted the compromise petition filed by both parties in this suit for specific performance of a contract dated 23.11.2023. The court found the compromise to be lawful and decreed the suit in accordance with the agreed terms, with the compromise petition forming part of the final decree. Court fees were ordered to be refunded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case