A.S RAJESWARI vs A.S RAJESHWARI AND OTHERS — 1956/2025
Case under Order 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section 26. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED EX-PARTE on 24th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KABR700023412025
Filing Number
2289/2025
Filing Date
30-May-2025
Registration No
1956/2025
Registration Date
30-May-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,KRISHNARAJAPURAM
Judge
1125-CIVIL Judge And JMFC
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECREED EX-PARTE
Last updated 29-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.A.S RAJESWARI
Adv. S.V PRAKASH
Respondent(s)
-
1.A.S RAJESHWARI AND OTHERS
-
2.ILYAZ AHMED
-
3.MOHAMMED AKBAR PASHA
-
4.IRSHAN KHAN
-
5.D1- B.DHANALAKSHMI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Judgment
The court decreed the plaintiffs' suit, declaring three fraudulent sale agreements dated 18-07-2022 null and void, and issued a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the property. The court found that Defendant No. 1 impersonated Plaintiff No. 1 to execute the agreements in favor of Defendants 2-4, supported by forensic evidence and criminal proceedings, and ordered the Sub-Registrar to cancel the registered documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
23-Mar-2026
Judgement.
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
12-Mar-2026
Judgement.
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
18-Feb-2026
Arguments
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
07-Feb-2026
Amended plaint
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
17-Dec-2025
Amended plaint
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
29-Nov-2025
Amended plaint
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
15-Nov-2025
Amended plaint
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
06-Nov-2025
Hearing
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
25-Oct-2025
Hearing
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
13-Oct-2025
Hearing
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
15-Sep-2025
Steps
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Jun-2025
Notice
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
30-May-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-May-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1956/2025
The court decreed the plaintiffs' suit, declaring three fraudulent sale agreements dated 18-07-2022 null and void, and issued a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the property. The court found that Defendant No. 1 impersonated Plaintiff No. 1 to execute the agreements in favor of Defendants 2-4, supported by forensic evidence and criminal proceedings, and ordered the Sub-Registrar to cancel the registered documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts