P.S. NARAYANASWAMY vs SANDEEP VIHAR OWNERS WELFARE ASSOCIATION REP BY PRESIDENT — 1604/2025
Case under Ix Rule 9 R Aw 151 Cpc Section 26. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KABR700020572025
Filing Number
2046/2025
Filing Date
23-Jun-2025
Registration No
1604/2025
Registration Date
23-Jun-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,KRISHNARAJAPURAM
Judge
1125-CIVIL Judge And JMFC
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.P.S. NARAYANASWAMY
Adv. C.K. NANDAKUMAR
-
2.PARVEEN KAUR
-
3.BALVINDER SINGH (Retd)
-
4.N.S.SIROHI (Retd)
Respondent(s)
-
1.SANDEEP VIHAR OWNERS WELFARE ASSOCIATION REP BY PRESIDENT
-
2.ARMY WELFARE HOUSING ORGANIZATION
Case History
-
19-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Mar-2026
Issues
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
04-Feb-2026
Issues
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
09-Jan-2026
Issues
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
08-Dec-2025
OrdersView PDF
Case Summary: O.S. No. 1604/2025 Outcome: Interim injunction applications (I.A. Nos. II and III) allowed; Defendant's court fee application (I.A. No. 35) rejected. Court granted temporary injunction restraining the apartment association and housing organization from interfering with 30 retired Army penthouse owners' peaceful possession and use of their units for dual occupancy (as two separate dwelling units) and their tenants' occupation, pending final trial disposal. The court found the owners made a prima facie case, established balance of convenience, and would suffer irreparable loss without the injunction, noting the sale deed contained no restriction on dual occupancy while the association's 2019 resolution restricting it appeared potentially contrary to public policy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Dec-2025
Issues
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
26-Nov-2025
Orders
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
10-Nov-2025
Orders
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
07-Nov-2025
Arguments
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
27-Oct-2025
Hearing
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
10-Oct-2025
Objections
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
23-Sep-2025
Hearing
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
22-Aug-2025
Amended plaint
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
02-Aug-2025
Amended plaint
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Jul-2025
Amended plaint
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
23-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1604/2025
Case Summary: O.S. No. 1604/2025 Outcome: Interim injunction applications (I.A. Nos. II and III) allowed; Defendant's court fee application (I.A. No. 35) rejected. Court granted temporary injunction restraining the apartment association and housing organization from interfering with 30 retired Army penthouse owners' peaceful possession and use of their units for dual occupancy (as two separate dwelling units) and their tenants' occupation, pending final trial disposal. The court found the owners made a prima facie case, established balance of convenience, and would suffer irreparable loss without the injunction, noting the sale deed contained no restriction on dual occupancy while the association's 2019 resolution restricting it appeared potentially contrary to public policy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts