M. BYRAPPA vs JAYAMMA — 1232/2025
Case under 117 R W 177 Imv Act Section U/OVIIRULE1. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED / REJECTED OTHERWISE on 23rd March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KABR700002392025
Filing Number
235/2025
Filing Date
03-May-2025
Registration No
1232/2025
Registration Date
03-May-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,KRISHNARAJAPURAM
Judge
1125-CIVIL Judge And JMFC
Decision Date
23-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED / REJECTED OTHERWISE
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M. BYRAPPA
Adv. M. S. VARADARAJAN
-
2.M. BACHANNA
-
3.M. RAMESH GOWDA
Respondent(s)
-
1.JAYAMMA
-
2.GAJJELE SUBBA REDDY
-
3.LAKSHMI
-
4.KALPANA
-
5.SHILPA
-
6.BHAGYA
-
7.ROOPA
-
8.A. SAROJA
-
9.JAMPANAPALLI MADHAVI
-
10.PALLEPOTHULA VENKATARAMI REDDY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
The suit filed by M. Byrappa, M. Bachanna, and M. Ramesh Gowda against Jayamma, Gajjele Subba Reddy, and Lakshmi was dismissed for non-prosecution on 23.03.2026. The Civil Judge found that despite multiple opportunities to lead evidence, the plaintiffs failed to appear or take any steps to prosecute the matter, demonstrating lack of interest in proceeding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Disposed
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
17-Mar-2026
Evidence..
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Mar-2026
Evidence..
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
13-Mar-2026
Evidence..
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
12-Mar-2026
Evidence..
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
05-Mar-2026
IssueView PDF
-
05-Mar-2026
Evidence..
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
04-Mar-2026
Issues.
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
04-Dec-2025
Notice
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
23-Oct-2025
Notice
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
29-Jul-2025
Notice
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
03-May-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-May-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1232/2025
The suit filed by M. Byrappa, M. Bachanna, and M. Ramesh Gowda against Jayamma, Gajjele Subba Reddy, and Lakshmi was dismissed for non-prosecution on 23.03.2026. The Civil Judge found that despite multiple opportunities to lead evidence, the plaintiffs failed to appear or take any steps to prosecute the matter, demonstrating lack of interest in proceeding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts