Ramesh H vs The Tahsildar — 424/2025
Case under Under Section 13 of 3 of Registration of Births and Deaths Act. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 27th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KABR610151062025
Filing Number
430/2025
Filing Date
11-Nov-2025
Registration No
424/2025
Registration Date
11-Nov-2025
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NELAMANGALA
Judge
104-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
Decision Date
27-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ramesh H
Adv. DILIP KUMAR
-
2.Sarojamma
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Tahsildar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
The court allowed the petition filed by Ramesh H and Sarojamma under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, directing the Tahsildar to register the death of their great-grandfather Ramaiah (died 12.06.1968) and issue a death certificate. The court found valid grounds based on the petitioners' testimony, genealogical documents, newspaper notices, and the respondent's non-availability certificate, noting the respondent remained absent (ex-parte) and established precedent that under Section 13(3), the court need only ascertain the fact of death, not the precise date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Mar-2026
Disposed
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
17-Mar-2026
Arguments
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
09-Feb-2026
Arguments
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
19-Jan-2026
Arguments
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
11-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 424/2025
The court allowed the petition filed by Ramesh H and Sarojamma under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, directing the Tahsildar to register the death of their great-grandfather Ramaiah (died 12.06.1968) and issue a death certificate. The court found valid grounds based on the petitioners' testimony, genealogical documents, newspaper notices, and the respondent's non-availability certificate, noting the respondent remained absent (ex-parte) and established precedent that under Section 13(3), the court need only ascertain the fact of death, not the precise date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts