Puttaiah vs Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Ltd (KPTCL) R/by its managing director — 364/2022
Case under Under Order Vii Rule 1 of Cpc Section 26. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KABR610111362022
Filing Number
367/2022
Filing Date
09-Sep-2022
Registration No
364/2022
Registration Date
09-Sep-2022
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NELAMANGALA
Judge
888-Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Puttaiah
Adv. Vidya Selvamany
-
2.Rangaswamy M
Respondent(s)
-
1.Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Ltd (KPTCL) R/by its managing director
Case History
-
29-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Mar-2026
Evidence
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
04-Feb-2026
Evidence
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
04-Nov-2025
Evidence
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
04-Aug-2025
Evidence
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
22-Apr-2025
Evidence
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
31-Jan-2025
OrdersView PDF
-
31-Jan-2025
OrdersView PDF
Case Summary: O.S. 364/2022 Outcome: The court rejected the plaintiffs' application for temporary injunction on January 31, 2025. The Additional Civil Judge found that the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case and therefore did not meet the threshold requirements for granting injunctive relief. Key Facts: Puttaiah and Rangaswamy sought to restrain KPTCL from erecting transmission towers on their property (1 acre 13 guntas in Sy.No.95/2, Arishinakunte Village). However, the court determined that the sale deed boundaries did not align with the suit property, and revenue documents alone cannot prove possession. KPTCL demonstrated statutory authority under the Electricity Act 2003 and Indian Telegraphic Act 1885 to construct the 220 kV transmission line, which had been publicly notified and approved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
31-Jan-2025
Evidence
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
30-Jan-2025
Orders
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
05-Dec-2024
Orders
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
28-Oct-2024
Orders
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
05-Sep-2024
Orders
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
05-Jul-2024
Orders
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
24-Apr-2024
Reply
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Jan-2024
Reply
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
22-Nov-2023
Reply
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
26-Oct-2023
Reply
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
04-Oct-2023
Reply
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
19-Aug-2023
Reply
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
05-Aug-2023
Reply
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
26-Jul-2023
Hearing
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
30-May-2023
Hearing
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
11-Apr-2023
Hearing
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
15-Mar-2023
Hearing
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
27-Feb-2023
Hearing
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
03-Jan-2023
Hearing
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
22-Nov-2022
Written Statement And Objection
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
11-Oct-2022
Summons
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
13-Sep-2022
Emergent Notice
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
12-Sep-2022
Emergent Notice
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
09-Sep-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Sep-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 364/2022
Case Summary: O.S. 364/2022 Outcome: The court rejected the plaintiffs' application for temporary injunction on January 31, 2025. The Additional Civil Judge found that the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case and therefore did not meet the threshold requirements for granting injunctive relief. Key Facts: Puttaiah and Rangaswamy sought to restrain KPTCL from erecting transmission towers on their property (1 acre 13 guntas in Sy.No.95/2, Arishinakunte Village). However, the court determined that the sale deed boundaries did not align with the suit property, and revenue documents alone cannot prove possession. KPTCL demonstrated statutory authority under the Electricity Act 2003 and Indian Telegraphic Act 1885 to construct the 220 kV transmission line, which had been publicly notified and approved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts