Nagaraju K vs Savithri — 379/2021
Case under Under Order Vii Rule 1 of Cpc. Disposed: Uncontested--PLAINT RETURNED on 24th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KABR610086902021
Filing Number
380/2021
Filing Date
28-Sep-2021
Registration No
379/2021
Registration Date
28-Sep-2021
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NELAMANGALA
Judge
888-Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
Decision Date
24-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLAINT RETURNED
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Nagaraju K
Adv. Shivachandra Nail R
-
2.Manjunath D
-
3.Shrikanth P
Respondent(s)
-
1.Savithri
-
2.The Principal Secretary
-
3.The Deputy Commissioner
-
4.The Assistant Commissioner
-
5.The Tahsildar
-
6.The Deputy Tahsildar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Apr-2026
OrdersView PDF
The court rejected the suit and returned the plaint to the plaintiffs, finding it lacked pecuniary jurisdiction. The court determined that based on gazette notification CVC/485/2017-18, the actual market value of the agricultural properties at Narayanapura village exceeded the court's jurisdictional limit, and the plaintiffs' valuation under the Karnataka Court Fees and Suit Valuation Act 1958 was incorrect. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Apr-2026
Disposed
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
17-Mar-2026
Orders
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
23-Feb-2026
Orders
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
09-Jan-2026
Orders
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
02-Dec-2025
Hearing
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
13-Nov-2025
Hearing
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
06-Nov-2025
Hearing
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
03-Nov-2025
Hearing
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
09-Oct-2025
Hearing
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
01-Sep-2025
Evidence
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
23-Jul-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
23-Jul-2025
Evidence
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
17-Jun-2025
Evidence
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
29-Apr-2025
Evidence
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
05-Mar-2025
Evidence
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
15-Jan-2025
Issues
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
12-Dec-2024
Objection
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
19-Oct-2024
Objection
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
21-Aug-2024
Objection
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
03-Jun-2024
Objection
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
26-Mar-2024
Objection
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
21-Feb-2024
Objection
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
09-Jan-2024
Evidence
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
20-Dec-2023
Evidence
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
05-Sep-2023
Evidence
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
07-Jul-2023
Evidence
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
10-Apr-2023
Evidence
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
03-Mar-2023
Written Statement And Objection
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
11-Jan-2023
Summons
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
17-Oct-2022
Steps
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
12-Sep-2022
Summons
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
08-Jun-2022
Summons
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
14-Mar-2022
Steps
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
18-Jan-2022
Steps
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
17-Nov-2021
Steps
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
26-Oct-2021
Summons
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
28-Sep-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Sep-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 379/2021
The court rejected the suit and returned the plaint to the plaintiffs, finding it lacked pecuniary jurisdiction. The court determined that based on gazette notification CVC/485/2017-18, the actual market value of the agricultural properties at Narayanapura village exceeded the court's jurisdictional limit, and the plaintiffs' valuation under the Karnataka Court Fees and Suit Valuation Act 1958 was incorrect. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts