CHANDRASHEKHARAIAH vs S.UMASHANKAR — 286/2022
Case under Under Order Vii Rule 1 of Cpc. Status: Reply. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KABR610082492022
Filing Number
289/2022
Filing Date
14-Jul-2022
Registration No
286/2022
Registration Date
14-Jul-2022
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NELAMANGALA
Judge
104-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CHANDRASHEKHARAIAH
Adv. JAYANNA
Respondent(s)
-
1.S.UMASHANKAR
Case History
-
19-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
08-Apr-2026
Reply
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
17-Mar-2026
Reply
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
27-Jan-2026
Reply
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
10-Dec-2025
Reply
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
13-Nov-2025
Reply
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
23-Sep-2025
Reply
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
18-Aug-2025
Reply
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
10-Jun-2025
Hearing
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
21-Mar-2025
Orders
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
03-Mar-2025
Orders
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
23-Jan-2025
Reply
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
07-Jan-2025
Reply
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
12-Dec-2024
Objection
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
02-Dec-2024
Arguments
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
25-Nov-2024
Arguments
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
19-Nov-2024
DepositionView PDF
Summary of Case 286/2022 (Chandrashekharaiah v. S. Umashankar) This is a property dispute involving a partition of ancestral land. The witness (petitioner's brother) testified on 19.11.2024 regarding a 1993 partition deed dividing family property, with each brother receiving 15 guntas of land (Survey No. 68/2). The dispute centers on a right-of-way path across the petitioner's land providing access to the respondent's property. The witness testified that the respondent has been using this passage since 1993 and has constructed a well on his portion. The petitioner contested the respondent's claims about path width and usage rights. The case remains pending for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Nov-2024
Arguments
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
04-Nov-2024
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
15-Oct-2024
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
27-Sep-2024
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
13-Sep-2024
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
22-Aug-2024
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
12-Aug-2024
Arguments
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
31-Jul-2024
Arguments
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
12-Jul-2024
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
01-Jul-2024
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
11-Jun-2024
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
05-Apr-2024
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
14-Feb-2024
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
20-Jan-2024
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
07-Nov-2023
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Sep-2023
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
17-Aug-2023
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
25-Jul-2023
Arguments
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
01-Jul-2023
Arguments
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
08-Jun-2023
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
07-Mar-2023
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
13-Dec-2022
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
15-Nov-2022
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
03-Nov-2022
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
29-Sep-2022
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
20-Aug-2022
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
30-Jul-2022
Written Statement And Objection
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
15-Jul-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-Jul-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 286/2022
Summary of Case 286/2022 (Chandrashekharaiah v. S. Umashankar) This is a property dispute involving a partition of ancestral land. The witness (petitioner's brother) testified on 19.11.2024 regarding a 1993 partition deed dividing family property, with each brother receiving 15 guntas of land (Survey No. 68/2). The dispute centers on a right-of-way path across the petitioner's land providing access to the respondent's property. The witness testified that the respondent has been using this passage since 1993 and has constructed a well on his portion. The petitioner contested the respondent's claims about path width and usage rights. The case remains pending for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts