GANGALAKSHMAMMA vs NARASIMHAMURTHY — 351/2021
Case under Under Order Vii Rule 1 of Cpc Section 26. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 17th July 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KABR610076972021
Filing Number
352/2021
Filing Date
13-Sep-2021
Registration No
351/2021
Registration Date
13-Sep-2021
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NELAMANGALA
Judge
888-Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GANGALAKSHMAMMA
Adv. N R NAGENDRA
Respondent(s)
-
1.NARASIMHAMURTHY
-
2.NATARAJU
-
3.SANTHOSH
-
4.MUNIRAJU
-
5.N V SIDDAPPA
-
6.N V VEERANNA
-
7.N V BHADRAIAH
-
8.N V SHIVANNA
-
9.N V SHIVARUDRAIAH
-
10.N V CHANDRAPPA
Case History
-
17-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
03-Jun-2026
OrdersView PDF
Case Summary: O.S. No. 351/2021 Gangalakshmamma sought a temporary injunction to restrain defendants from constructing on disputed property, claiming she held a legitimate share as the daughter of the original owner. The court dismissed her application, finding she failed to establish the three mandatory requirements for injunctive relief: prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable harm. The property was sold to defendants in 1974 and subsequently converted to residential use. Parties bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Jun-2026
Evidence
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
02-May-2026
Orders
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
29-Apr-2026
Objection
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
17-Mar-2026
Evidence
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
24-Feb-2026
Evidence
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
03-Jan-2026
Evidence
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
05-Dec-2025
Written Statement And Objection
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
05-Nov-2025
Written Statement And Objection
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
05-Aug-2025
Objection
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
10-Jun-2025
Evidence
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
15-Apr-2025
Evidence
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
04-Mar-2025
Evidence
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
25-Jan-2025
Evidence
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
05-Dec-2024
Evidence
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
24-Sep-2024
Evidence
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
29-Aug-2024
Evidence
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
25-Jun-2024
Evidence
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
03-Apr-2024
Evidence
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
21-Feb-2024
Evidence
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
15-Dec-2023
Evidence
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
02-Dec-2023
Evidence
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
11-Oct-2023
Evidence
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
20-Jul-2023
Evidence
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
21-Apr-2023
Evidence
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
01-Feb-2023
Evidence
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
05-Dec-2022
Evidence
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
01-Oct-2022
Evidence
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
18-Jul-2022
Evidence
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Jun-2022
Issues
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
19-Apr-2022
Written Statement
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
09-Mar-2022
Written Statement
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
09-Feb-2022
Summons
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
10-Jan-2022
Summons
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
18-Oct-2021
Summons
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
13-Sep-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Sep-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 351/2021
Case Summary: O.S. No. 351/2021 Gangalakshmamma sought a temporary injunction to restrain defendants from constructing on disputed property, claiming she held a legitimate share as the daughter of the original owner. The court dismissed her application, finding she failed to establish the three mandatory requirements for injunctive relief: prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable harm. The property was sold to defendants in 1974 and subsequently converted to residential use. Parties bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts