SIDDAGANGAMMA vs SIDDABYRA — 237/2015
Case under Under Order Vii Rule 1 of Cpc. Disposed: Uncontested--PLAINT REJECTED on 15th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KABR610016872015
Filing Number
238/2015
Filing Date
23-Jun-2015
Registration No
237/2015
Registration Date
24-Jun-2015
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NELAMANGALA
Judge
104-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
Decision Date
15-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLAINT REJECTED
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SIDDAGANGAMMA
Adv. M.SHANKARAIAH
-
2.SIDDALAKSHMAMMA
-
3.GANGAMMA
-
4.NANJAMMA
-
5.AMBIKA
Respondent(s)
-
1.SIDDABYRA
-
2.NAGARAJU
-
3.GANGAMMA
-
4.SUKAMMA
-
5.LAKSHMAMMA
-
6.BYRAMMA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Jun-2026
OrdersView PDF
Case Summary: OS No. 237/2015 The Principal Civil Judge rejected the plaintiffs' partition suit, finding it barred by limitation and filed with suppressed material facts. The court determined that a partition of joint family properties had already occurred in 1969, evidenced by the plaintiffs' own father's earlier 1973 lawsuit acknowledging the partition and the allocation of specific properties to each family branch. Since nearly 60 years had elapsed since the partition, the suit was held unmaintainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Jun-2026
Disposed
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
12-Jun-2026
Orders
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
10-Jun-2026
Orders
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
08-Jun-2026
Orders
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
21-Apr-2026
Hearing
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
17-Mar-2026
Hearing
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
03-Feb-2026
Hearing
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
11-Dec-2025
Orders
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
02-Dec-2025
Hearing
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
10-Nov-2025
Hearing
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
18-Sep-2025
Hearing
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
19-Aug-2025
Hearing
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
17-Jul-2025
Hearing
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Jun-2025
Hearing
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
03-Apr-2025
Hearing
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
15-Mar-2025
Arguments
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
04-Mar-2025
Hearing
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
04-Jan-2025
Hearing
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
02-Jan-2025
Hearing
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
07-Nov-2024
Hearing
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
20-Sep-2024
Hearing
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
03-Aug-2024
Hearing
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
22-Jun-2024
Hearing
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
25-Mar-2024
Hearing
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Feb-2024
Hearing
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
20-Jan-2024
Hearing
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
11-Dec-2023
Hearing
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
25-Nov-2023
Objection
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
30-Sep-2023
Objection
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
18-Aug-2023
Objection
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
01-Aug-2023
Objection
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
18-Jul-2023
Objection
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
12-Jun-2023
Objection
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
18-Apr-2023
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
07-Feb-2023
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
15-Dec-2022
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
08-Nov-2022
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
11-Oct-2022
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
23-Aug-2022
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
07-Jul-2022
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
24-May-2022
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
02-Mar-2022
Steps
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
06-Jan-2022
Steps
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
11-Nov-2021
Amended Plaint
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
07-Oct-2021
Amended Plaint
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
04-Aug-2021
Amended Plaint
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
15-Jul-2021
Amended Plaint
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
23-Apr-2021
Amended Plaint
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
27-Mar-2021
Amended Plaint
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
17-Mar-2021
Amended Plaint
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Mar-2021
Orders
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
21-Jan-2021
Notice
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
19-Dec-2020
Notice
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
21-Oct-2020
Notice
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
19-Sep-2020
Notice
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
13-Aug-2020
Notice
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
12-Jun-2020
Notice
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
27-Mar-2020
Notice
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
05-Feb-2020
Notice
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
20-Dec-2019
Notice
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
19-Oct-2019
Notice
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
31-Aug-2019
Notice
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
21-Jun-2019
Notice
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
02-Mar-2019
Notice
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
15-Dec-2018
Notice
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
11-Oct-2018
Notice
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
31-Jul-2018
Notice
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
22-Jun-2018
Steps
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
03-Mar-2018
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
24-Nov-2017
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
12-Oct-2017
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
04-Aug-2017
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
08-Jun-2017
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
28-Jan-2017
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
03-Nov-2016
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
08-Sep-2016
Summons
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
04-Jul-2016
Summons
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
03-Jun-2016
Summons
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
09-Mar-2016
Await Notice
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
14-Dec-2015
Summons
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
17-Oct-2015
Summons
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
10-Sep-2015
Summons
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
01-Aug-2015
Summons
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
30-Jun-2015
Summons
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
29-Jun-2015
Orders
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
27-Jun-2015
Orders
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
25-Jun-2015
Hearing
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
24-Jun-2015
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Jun-2015
Case filed
Registration No. 237/2015
Case Summary: OS No. 237/2015 The Principal Civil Judge rejected the plaintiffs' partition suit, finding it barred by limitation and filed with suppressed material facts. The court determined that a partition of joint family properties had already occurred in 1969, evidenced by the plaintiffs' own father's earlier 1973 lawsuit acknowledging the partition and the allocation of specific properties to each family branch. Since nearly 60 years had elapsed since the partition, the suit was held unmaintainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts