Chikkanna G C vs The Tahsildar — 70/2026

Case under Under Section 13 of 3 of Registration of Births and Deaths Act. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 20th May 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KABR610005202026

Filing Number

70/2026

Filing Date

07-Feb-2026

Registration No

70/2026

Registration Date

07-Feb-2026

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NELAMANGALA

Judge

104-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

Decision Date

20-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Section 13 of 3 of Registration of Births and Deaths Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Chikkanna G C

    Adv. HAREESH PG

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Tahsildar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-May-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case Summary: C.Misc.No.70/2026 The court allowed Chikkanna G.C.'s petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, directing the Tahsildar to register and issue a birth certificate for his son Ruthvik G.C. (born 02.04.2018). The petitioner's testimony, supported by a mother card and genealogical documents, established the child's birth, and the respondent's failure to appear and contest the claim provided no justifiable grounds for rejection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-May-2026

    Disposed

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  5. 01-Apr-2026

    ExhibitsView PDF

  6. 01-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  7. 17-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  8. 07-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 07-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 70/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.Misc.No.70/2026 The court allowed Chikkanna G.C.'s petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, directing the Tahsildar to register and issue a birth certificate for his son Ruthvik G.C. (born 02.04.2018). The petitioner's testimony, supported by a mother card and genealogical documents, established the child's birth, and the respondent's failure to appear and contest the claim provided no justifiable grounds for rejection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case