Hanumantharayappa vs Nagaraju — 47/2023
Case under Under Order Vii Rule 1 of Cpc Section 26. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 01st July 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KABR610002492023
Filing Number
47/2023
Filing Date
24-Jan-2023
Registration No
47/2023
Registration Date
24-Jan-2023
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NELAMANGALA
Judge
888-Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
Last updated 29-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Hanumantharayappa
Adv. Hanumanthaiah D R
Respondent(s)
-
1.Nagaraju
-
2.Siddagangamma
-
3.Jayaramu
Case History
-
01-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
23-Mar-2026
Evidence
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
15-Dec-2025
Evidence
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
11-Nov-2025
Evidence
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Sep-2025
Evidence
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
24-Jul-2025
Evidence
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
20-Jun-2025
Evidence
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
18-Feb-2025
Evidence
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
09-Jan-2025
Evidence
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
22-Nov-2024
Evidence
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
27-Sep-2024
Evidence
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
05-Sep-2024
Evidence
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
24-Jun-2024
Evidence
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
27-Apr-2024
Evidence
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
05-Mar-2024
Evidence
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
04-Dec-2023
Evidence
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
11-Sep-2023
Issues
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
29-Aug-2023
Issues
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
13-Jul-2023
Orders
-
13-Jul-2023
Orders
Case Summary: O.S. No. 47/2023 Outcome: Temporary injunction application dismissed. Key Facts: Plaintiff Hanumantharayappa sought to restrain defendants (Nagaraju, Siddagangamma, and Jayaramu) from interfering with two properties inherited through a 1972 partition deed. The court found that boundaries described in the plaintiff's claim did not match those in the partition deed itself, leaving property identification in dispute. Despite plaintiff's tax records and possession evidence, the court concluded he failed to establish a prima facie case necessary for interim relief and dismissed the application with no cost order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Jul-2023
Issues
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
27-Jun-2023
Orders
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
06-Jun-2023
Orders
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
30-May-2023
Hearing
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
29-May-2023
Hearing
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
21-Apr-2023
Reply
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
19-Apr-2023
Reply
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
31-Mar-2023
Reply
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
23-Mar-2023
Hearing
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
13-Mar-2023
Hearing
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
01-Mar-2023
Written Statement And Objection
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
27-Jan-2023
Emergent Notice
III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
25-Jan-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Jan-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 47/2023
Case Summary: O.S. No. 47/2023 Outcome: Temporary injunction application dismissed. Key Facts: Plaintiff Hanumantharayappa sought to restrain defendants (Nagaraju, Siddagangamma, and Jayaramu) from interfering with two properties inherited through a 1972 partition deed. The court found that boundaries described in the plaintiff's claim did not match those in the partition deed itself, leaving property identification in dispute. Despite plaintiff's tax records and possession evidence, the court concluded he failed to establish a prima facie case necessary for interim relief and dismissed the application with no cost order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts