Rangaiah vs The Tahasildar — 35/2026

Case under Under Section 13 of 3 of Registration of Births and Deaths Act. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 24th April 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KABR610002342026

Filing Number

35/2026

Filing Date

19-Jan-2026

Registration No

35/2026

Registration Date

19-Jan-2026

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NELAMANGALA

Judge

104-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

Decision Date

24-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Section 13 of 3 of Registration of Births and Deaths Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rangaiah

    Adv. Kanakaraju G.N

  2. 2.B. Bettaiah

  3. 3.Rangaswamy D

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Tahasildar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Apr-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case 35/2026 Summary The court allowed the petitioners' petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, directing the Tahasildar to register the death of Hucchamma (deceased on 01.10.1985) and issue a death certificate. The court found sufficient evidence through documentary proof including a non-availability certificate, notarized genealogical tree, and property records, coupled with the respondent's ex-parte default, to establish the factum of death despite the delay in registration caused by lack of knowledge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    First Hearing

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  6. 19-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 19-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 35/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 35/2026 Summary The court allowed the petitioners' petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, directing the Tahasildar to register the death of Hucchamma (deceased on 01.10.1985) and issue a death certificate. The court found sufficient evidence through documentary proof including a non-availability certificate, notarized genealogical tree, and property records, coupled with the respondent's ex-parte default, to establish the factum of death despite the delay in registration caused by lack of knowledge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case