Rangaiah vs The Thahasildar — 28/2026

Case under Under Section 13 of 3 of Registration of Births and Deaths Act. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 24th April 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KABR610002262026

Filing Number

28/2026

Filing Date

19-Jan-2026

Registration No

28/2026

Registration Date

19-Jan-2026

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NELAMANGALA

Judge

104-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

Decision Date

24-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Section 13 of 3 of Registration of Births and Deaths Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rangaiah

    Adv. Advocate

  2. 2.Bettaiah B

  3. 3.Rangaswamy D

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Thahasildar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Apr-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case Summary: 28/2026 The court allowed the petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, directing the Tahasildar to register the death of Alaiah S/o late Dasappa (grandfather of petitioners) dated 03.06.1953 and issue a death certificate. The court found the petitioners established valid grounds through witness testimony, a notarized genealogical tree, property records, and newspaper notices, while the respondent's ex-parte default strengthened the petitioners' case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    First Hearing

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  6. 19-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 19-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 28/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 28/2026 The court allowed the petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, directing the Tahasildar to register the death of Alaiah S/o late Dasappa (grandfather of petitioners) dated 03.06.1953 and issue a death certificate. The court found the petitioners established valid grounds through witness testimony, a notarized genealogical tree, property records, and newspaper notices, while the respondent's ex-parte default strengthened the petitioners' case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case